Anonymous user
User talk:Sapphire Moondust: Difference between revisions
→Re: Question About Reverted Edits
imported>Icemandeaf (→Re: Question About Reverted Edits: new section) |
imported>LostInRiverview |
||
Line 67:
Unless you had someone leave you a message on your talk page about those edits, I doubt they were any serious problems. People are humans and make mistakes. It happens to the best of us. I have had my own edits reverted at times from time to time as well. The important thing is to learn from the mistake you made and try to be better next time. That's the path to becoming a good editor. And by the way, I did have a good weekend which was pretty full. That is why I wasn't around much, but I'm back now. -- [[User:Icemandeaf|Icemandeaf]] ([[User talk:Icemandeaf|talk]]) 16:51, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
:I'll add on to this. Sometimes it's not even a mistake, it's just a difference of opinion between one editor and another editor. If your edit is reverted (and isn't {{WP|Wikipedia:Rollback|rolled back}}), then the editor that reverted it should give a reason why in their edit summary, which is viewable in the page's history. If you disagree with their reversion, you should take it up with them on their user talk page, or you can start a discussion on the article talk page. But as Icemandeaf said, if they didn't warn you, then you're not going to be in trouble. On top of that, it's clear that you're acting in good faith, so even if you made a mistake it would be [[TSW:AGF|treated as a mistake, not a malicious act]]. - '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 17:19, July 20, 2015 (UTC)
| |||