Forum:Adding incomplete information?: Difference between revisions

From The Sims Wiki, a collaborative database for The Sims series
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>LostInRiverview
imported>Auror Andrachome
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
==Discussion==
==Discussion==
Personally, I would err towards including the information even if it's not complete. Adding it to the article allows other users to fill in the missing pieces, whereas if it's placed on the talk page, other users might not notice it. Try to use the {{t|Expand}} tag on sections that are missing information. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 22:43, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
Personally, I would err towards including the information even if it's not complete. Adding it to the article allows other users to fill in the missing pieces, whereas if it's placed on the talk page, other users might not notice it. Try to use the {{t|Expand}} tag on sections that are missing information. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 22:43, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
:Going with what Liron just said, I'd rather we just add the information to the article itself rather than to the talk page. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 22:50, May 31, 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:50, 31 May 2014

Forums: IndexCommunity discussionsAdding incomplete information? | Post

I've been working on the List of Wishes article pretty hardcore this last week and intend to greatly expand upon it. I thought I would ask if anyone thought it would be a good idea to add incomplete entries to a section in the talk page rather than on the main page? My definition of incomplete would be lacking the three primary pieces of information, excluding the Wish Icon. My reason being that anyone can remember the name of a wish and simply adding more mostly empty entries is just creating more work. Anyone else who sees one in the game and adds it without the description or point value is just being lazy. Id rather have a clean article than an empty table with incomplete information. (Ie look at my Into the Future section compared to the Generations section.Willlamme1988 (talk) 20:13, May 3, 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

Personally, I would err towards including the information even if it's not complete. Adding it to the article allows other users to fill in the missing pieces, whereas if it's placed on the talk page, other users might not notice it. Try to use the {{Expand}} tag on sections that are missing information. -- LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 22:43, May 10, 2014 (UTC)

Going with what Liron just said, I'd rather we just add the information to the article itself rather than to the talk page. Ѧüя◎ґ (talk) 22:50, May 31, 2014 (UTC)