Forum:Consistent article format - it should realy be talked about!: Difference between revisions

From The Sims Wiki, a collaborative database for The Sims series
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>DrakonoSkerdikas
imported>DrakonoSkerdikas
Line 2: Line 2:
==Discussion==
==Discussion==
I don't understand what you're even proposing here. [[Special:Contributions/74.198.131.130|74.198.131.130]] ([[User talk:74.198.131.130|talk]]) 23:12, July 5, 2019 (UTC)
I don't understand what you're even proposing here. [[Special:Contributions/74.198.131.130|74.198.131.130]] ([[User talk:74.198.131.130|talk]]) 23:12, July 5, 2019 (UTC)
:A discussion of whether article structure format should be implemented. Other wikis seem to follow this suit, but not really this one. [[User:DrakonoSkerdikas|DrakonoSkerdikas]] ([[User talk:DrakonoSkerdikas|talk]]) 23:21, July 5, 2019 (UTC)
:A discussion of whether article structure format should be implemented. Other wikis seem to follow this suit, but not really this one. I strongly think it should be, like a formal guideline page of sorts catering respectively for different content groups (object, mechanics, expansion packs). What these format will be is another talk-- that is If this proposal of including such possible is gone about ''doing''.
[[User:DrakonoSkerdikas|DrakonoSkerdikas]] ([[User talk:DrakonoSkerdikas|talk]]) 23:21, July 5, 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:24, 5 July 2019

Forums: IndexCommunity discussionsConsistent article format - it should realy be talked about! | Post

Because it's a bit starting to annoy me when it comes to editing articles, those that are of the common content group. They're pretty inconsistent with formatting when comparing; Though for some reason, this isn't really a problem for those of Sim, Lot and (I believe) Worlds. Things like objects, simology mechanics and maybe even content pack articles (though there is more than I can list top from my head now). I may give examples later on, but what are your thoughts on this issue? Should sort of protocol/policy regulation for authors to follow a policy when creating new, and even modifying current articles, to at least keep them consistency by looking at examples of articles of the game? DrakonoSkerdikas (talk) 22:54, July 5, 2019 (UTC)

Discussion

I don't understand what you're even proposing here. 74.198.131.130 (talk) 23:12, July 5, 2019 (UTC)

A discussion of whether article structure format should be implemented. Other wikis seem to follow this suit, but not really this one. I strongly think it should be, like a formal guideline page of sorts catering respectively for different content groups (object, mechanics, expansion packs). What these format will be is another talk-- that is If this proposal of including such possible is gone about doing.

DrakonoSkerdikas (talk) 23:21, July 5, 2019 (UTC)