Forum:Inactive admins: Difference between revisions
imported>C.Syde65 mNo edit summary |
imported>C.Syde65 mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Discussion== |
==Discussion== |
||
{{VoteAgainst}} '''Oppose''' - Several of those users have not left the wiki indefinitely. Some of those users are currently busy and don't have much time to edit at the moment. Also the circumstances have not changed since the [[Forum:Reusing inactive admin policy|last time]] someone tried to suggest readopting wiki projects or inactive admin policies. And the consensus was that they were not needed, and that as long as a user doesn't come back and abuse their rights, there is no reason why they should be pressured to stay active or have their rights revoked. ― <span style="font:bold 108% 'Constantia';">[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="#800020">C.Syde</font>]]</span> <span style="font: 108% 'Adobe Garamond Pro';">([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="#000000">talk</font>]] | [[Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="#000000">contribs</font>]])</span> 01:20, December 3, 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:23, 3 December 2019
I think wiki projects should come back cause we have Beds/Joey.eyeball\Frostwalker/Icemandeaf/Woganhemlock/RR
No one has picked up this site wiki activity is mostly random users Cassandra1201 (talk) 01:14, December 3, 2019 (UTC)
Discussion
Oppose - Several of those users have not left the wiki indefinitely. Some of those users are currently busy and don't have much time to edit at the moment. Also the circumstances have not changed since the last time someone tried to suggest readopting wiki projects or inactive admin policies. And the consensus was that they were not needed, and that as long as a user doesn't come back and abuse their rights, there is no reason why they should be pressured to stay active or have their rights revoked. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 01:20, December 3, 2019 (UTC)