Forum:Reusing inactive admin policy: Difference between revisions
imported>K6ka m (Signing comment by 208.87.237.180) |
imported>C.Syde65 No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
==Discussion== |
==Discussion== |
||
Maybe we could remove inactive admins from the list, and remove their green username highlights. But we shouldn't go as far as to revoke their admin rights, because they may plan on returning. And if they don't want their admin rights, they can always revoke them themselves. -- '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 01:54, December 20, 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:54, 20 December 2014
we should use the inactive admin policy because if we don't it will be to any inactive admins and no space for new admins and the inactive admin thesims23 is probably never coming ck. pros of it 1. new spots for admins 2. inactive admins will want to come back 3. makes users want to contribute 4. makes people want to be active cons and solutions 1. bureaucrats are free - we can report that to wikia staff—Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.87.237.180 (talk • contribs) 17:04, December 19, 2014 (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
Discussion
Maybe we could remove inactive admins from the list, and remove their green username highlights. But we shouldn't go as far as to revoke their admin rights, because they may plan on returning. And if they don't want their admin rights, they can always revoke them themselves. -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 01:54, December 20, 2014 (UTC)