Anonymous user
The Sims Wiki:Requests for administratorship: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Sims Wiki:Requests for administratorship (edit)
Revision as of 01:20, 10 May 2013
, 11 years ago→Conclusion
imported>Lost Labyrinth |
imported>Pidgeoraptor7 |
||
Line 177:
The time to vote has expired. There is no conclusion yet. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 18:08, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
Ultimately, there are a couple issues which make it difficult to determine the outcome of this vote. [[User:Lost Labyrinth|Lost Labyrinth]] struck out a vote in support of the RfA, but it needs to be determined whether this is something that should've been done. The outcome of that decision may have an impact on the vote totals, which currently are 7 Support, 7 Oppose, 2 neutral. If the struck-out support were returned, the outcome would be 8 - 7 - 2. This is irrespective of any arguments about strength of votes, which if upheld would chop multiple votes out of (possibly) both columns.
I do not believe I personally am suited to make this decision. I would like a neutral bureaucrat to rule this RfA either approved or denied, and to help determine whether the vote struck out should be kept or thrown out. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 18:12, May 9, 2013 (UTC)
:I guess this will be first role as the Ombudsman, so I may as well ''try'' to be neutral.
:HanaGoth96 joined almost 4 months ago. In that time, she has managed to rack up about 2000 edits. This is a very large number indeed, especially for someone who's been on the wiki for only about a third of a year. She's managed to make as many edits in this amount of time as I, for one, have in about a year. Hana has worked to combat vandalism throughout her time here, though she may not have done it in an agreeable way. Some users say that she has an excellent edit history, others say that it isn't all that excellent.
:She definitely shows the potential of being a great and profficient editor. She has already demonstrated this. I voted for her. But now, reading over the votes from a neutral standpoint, I come to see that some of the other users have a point. I agree with Lab in saying that nobody truly deserves these rights: it is a tool that is earned and given to a select few who others believe will use it wisely. I myself noted that I thought Hana was deserving of sysop rights, but I now see that I was faulty in saying that she deserved it; maybe it would have been better to say that she has earned them.
:Hana has had a history of being hot-headed when it comes to reverting vandalism, and she has admitted to this herself. On one note, she is a human, as Ash pointed out, and she is learning from her mistakes as anyone would do. She has engaged herself in edit wars, but she has done what she thinks is right. Looking back at this I agree with others in their opinion that she is not ready yet.
:Hana has proven that she is capable. But after looking at this over again, I think that in time she will earn them. Therefore, I think that she will earn them after a while. I hope to create no ill-will. My intention is to keep the peace amongst other users, and I think this is really a stressing situation.
:In conclusion, I think Hana is not yet ready to earn these rights, though I will likely support her in a future nomination. {{PGRSig}} 01:20, May 10, 2013 (UTC)
| |||