Anonymous user
Forum:Merging compilation pack articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
imported>Beds |
imported>Lost Labyrinth No edit summary |
||
Line 3:
==Discussion==
Sticking with what I said in the last forum discussion on this topic, I think we should merge all compilation pack articles by generation as it saves other users from trailing through many articles to find the pack they're looking for. It also reduces the amount of cluttered articles. [[User:Beds|<font color="#6B1D51">'''Beds'''</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:Beds|<font color="#512d17">'''parlare'''</font>]] - [[User_blog:Beds|<font color="#512d17">'''da leggere'''</font>]])</sup> 19:22, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
Having pages on stuff like [[The Sims 3 Plus Pets]] and [[The Sims 2 Fun with Pets Collection]] is almost pointless as it's nearly impossible to make articles worth reading based on a base game and an EP being packaged together. I fully support the merge. {{LabSig}} 00:17, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
| |||