Anonymous user
The Sims Wiki:Requests for administratorship/Joey.eyeball (January 2014): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The Sims Wiki:Requests for administratorship/Joey.eyeball (January 2014) (edit)
Revision as of 01:23, 5 February 2014
, 10 years ago→Interpretation of consensus
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
imported>Lost Labyrinth |
||
Line 26:
==Interpretation of consensus==
This discussion has surpassed the five day discussion period and a consensus does not exist to favor promotion. Under the RfA discussion rules, a request can only proceed to a vote in cases where it's unclear whether or not a consensus exists to support promotion. When using a general definition for consensus (in this case, a definition of 'general agreement'), this RfA has clearly not reached that stage, so I will be suggesting that this RfA be declined and that it not proceed to a vote. This is a difficult interpretation, however, so I am going to request that another bureaucrat weigh in as well on whether this matter should proceed to vote or be declined now. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 01:18, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
:Ideally, we need roughly two-thirds support from the discussion for a promotion to take place. Although it's close from determining consensus here (and by weighing up strength of argument, of which I do remind '''does''' matter), we don't have the required two-thirds majority support and I feel that the best course of action would be to decline this RfA. {{LabSig}} 01:23, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
| |||