Forum:Change to rollback rights requests: Difference between revisions

I had, in fact, discussed the nomination with two other users privately over IRC, so it was not a "one person opinion". --I am [[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] [[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF">^{Talk to me!}</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F">_{See what I have done}</span>]] 00:34, November 19, 2015 (UTC)

:In the spirit of full disclosure, K6ka did consult with me prior to making that nomination and I did privately indicate my support. However, I do believe C.Syde still has a valid point; to the outside observer, it would appear as though he chose a candidate and then immediately gave them a promotion. This gets more to the problems of having some wiki-related matters discussed off-wiki, but that's not the point of this discussion. I will say that, in the proposed procedure, such an issue would be a moot point, as the nominating user would never be in the position to promote without having at least a two-administrator concurrence on the request page. I should also add that my proposal would not include the nominating administrator/bureaucrat as one of the two administrators granting concurrence; in other words, if a bureaucrat or admin nominates a candidate for rollback, two ''other'' administrators or bureaucrats would need to support it, not just one. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<span style="color:navy;">LiR</span>]]^{[[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]}''' 05:10, November 19, 2015 (UTC)