Talk:Juice: Difference between revisions

496 bytes added ,  9 years ago
m
adding talkheader template
imported>Makiah
No edit summary
imported>LiRBot
m (adding talkheader template)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Talkheader}}
==Redirect==
The purpose of that redirect wasn't so that people could link to "Juice," but so people searching for information on juices can more easily find it without knowing the exact article title. Typically articles with titles that are easily misspelled are usually redirected to from the more common misspellings; that's the kind of thing I was going for there. —[[User:Jimbo Jambo|Jimbo Jambo]]
Line 7 ⟶ 8:
 
:::Ultimately it is my decision if I feel to delete a page or not. However if you would like to try and overturn that decision your welcome to try and do so via the page listed above. Complain all you want but if your not going to try and do anything then what's the point of complaining? If there are many broken links then clearly there is a misconception of what the page name is. It needs a redirect because it has another title. For example many of the expansion pack pages are titled [[The Sims: Vacation]] or [[The Sims 2: Seasons]] then have a redirect titled the expansion pack name like [[Seasons]]. This is because many users were typing <nowiki>[[Seasons]]</nowiki> in article pages without checking as to why there was no page. Thus a redirect is perfectly acceptable instead of fixing all the broken links. Links in pages show issues in searching, in my opinion. Plus if nothing links to the page Juice then it becomes a Orphaned Page. [[User:Makiah|<font color="red">Makiah</font>]] [[User talk:Makiah|<small><font color="red">(talk)</font></small>]] 04:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 
::::I know what you're saying, but I just don't see what's so bad about having that orphaned page. Like I said, it's not for linking, it's for searching, and as far as I know making it doesn't have any downsides. I wouldn't call this complaining by the way. At this point I'm either trying to get my point across or find the flaw in it which apparently makes it so disagreeable, and I don't want to bother creating a new page for that purpose. —[[User:Jimbo Jambo|Jimbo Jambo]]
Anonymous user