Talk:List of Sims with parodies: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>K6kaBOT
m (Bot: Fixed link to disambig page - AspirationAspiration (The Sims 2))
imported>LostInRiverview
No edit summary
Line 16: Line 16:


:Also about similar appearances... I don't think just because their hairstyle or clothes are similar would mean they're parodies. These Sims might be created by different people and they didn't realize they had made similar looking Sims. And yeah, Timothy Riley did remind me of John Burb, but their backstories don't seem to relate so I never thought he was a parody... [[User:Nikel23|'''<span style="color:#007FFF; text-shadow: #ACE5EE 0 4px 4px;">Nikel</span>''']] [[User talk:Nikel23|<span style="color: #30D5C8 ; text-shadow: #00FFEF 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Talk''</sub></span>]] <sub>–</sub> [[The Sims Wiki:Featured Media/Voting|<span style="color:red ; text-shadow:#E97451 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Vote!''</sub></span>]] 09:53, September 5, 2014 (UTC)
:Also about similar appearances... I don't think just because their hairstyle or clothes are similar would mean they're parodies. These Sims might be created by different people and they didn't realize they had made similar looking Sims. And yeah, Timothy Riley did remind me of John Burb, but their backstories don't seem to relate so I never thought he was a parody... [[User:Nikel23|'''<span style="color:#007FFF; text-shadow: #ACE5EE 0 4px 4px;">Nikel</span>''']] [[User talk:Nikel23|<span style="color: #30D5C8 ; text-shadow: #00FFEF 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Talk''</sub></span>]] <sub>–</sub> [[The Sims Wiki:Featured Media/Voting|<span style="color:red ; text-shadow:#E97451 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Vote!''</sub></span>]] 09:53, September 5, 2014 (UTC)

==Discussion of notability==
This article was marked as having questionable notability under [[TSW:NP]] two years ago, but there has not been any discussion since then regarding what to do with the article.

This article, in my opinion, falls within the "allowed content" category defined in TSW:NP, and that the content is relevant to the wiki. However, that does not automatically mean that the article itself is notable enough to be kept.

Is there any input regarding whether or not the topic of this article is notable enough to be kept? -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<span style="color:navy;">LiR</span>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 04:44, February 5, 2016 (UTC)