Anonymous user
Talk:List of Traits: Difference between revisions
→New arrangement of traits: Finalizing need comments
imported>Duskey m (→New arrangement of traits: typos) |
imported>Duskey (→New arrangement of traits: Finalizing need comments) |
||
Line 205:
:::::::::::Also, maybe we should add the new ambitions traits first so people can start using the talk pages, I'm sure they're more exciting these days. I'm still abit oblivious as to what Reimi was talking about earlier. If we go ahead and implement the above table in the list of traits (and get all traits into their own pages) do we ditch the alphabetic TOC? With these two changes in mind people can either search this wiki directly or use their browser to search the table above to find a trait, I don't see a real need for a specific alphabet listing. [[User:Duskey|Duskey]] 20:29, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
::::::::::::I fiddled with the table again and made trait counters. Too much? [[User:Duskey|Duskey]] 08:45, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
===Finalizing===
Alright, all traits are now on their own pages. The table is as good as it's gonna get this time around (unless anyone has some feedback). I suggest we move the table to the [[List of Traits]], delete the old info there, BUT keep the alphabetic sorting of trait names with ''Main article'' link to each individual trait page. There's alot of pages linking to letters on the list of traits and they should be sorted before we delete the old info completely. There's still the matter of hidden and dropped traits, should they stay at the bottom of the list? [[User_talk:Duskey|| Duskey |]] 17:09, June 14, 2010 (UTC)
== Progress on Traits ==
| |||