Anonymous user
Talk:List of Traits: Difference between revisions
→New arrangement of traits: reply
imported>Duskey (→Ambitions: reply) |
imported>Duskey (→New arrangement of traits: reply) |
||
Line 170:
::::::::::Well I think this is all a good idea. If you need an an extra hand in creating the articles or whatever, give me a shout on my talk page. [[User:LostInRiverview|LostInRiverview]] 22:52, June 11, 2010 (UTC)
:::::::::::I think we need all the hands we can get. I finished the table up above, does it miss anything? Is there a way we can make it better? [[User:Duskey|Duskey]] 17:59, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
:::::::::::Also, maybe we should add the new ambitions traits first so people can start using the talk pages, I'm sure they're more exciting these days. I'm still abit oblivious as to what Reimi was talking about earlier. If we go ahead and implement the above table in the list of traits (and get all traits into their own pages) do we ditch the alphabetic TOC? With these two changes in mind people can either search this wiki directly or use their browser to search the table above to find a trait, I don't see a real need for a specific alphabet listing. [[User:Duskey|Duskey]] 20:29, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
| |||