Anonymous user
Talk:List of Traits: Difference between revisions
→Progress on Traits: new section
imported>Duskey (→New arrangement of traits: reply) |
imported>LostInRiverview (→Progress on Traits: new section) |
||
Line 171:
:::::::::::I think we need all the hands we can get. I finished the table up above, does it miss anything? Is there a way we can make it better? [[User:Duskey|Duskey]] 17:59, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
:::::::::::Also, maybe we should add the new ambitions traits first so people can start using the talk pages, I'm sure they're more exciting these days. I'm still abit oblivious as to what Reimi was talking about earlier. If we go ahead and implement the above table in the list of traits (and get all traits into their own pages) do we ditch the alphabetic TOC? With these two changes in mind people can either search this wiki directly or use their browser to search the table above to find a trait, I don't see a real need for a specific alphabet listing. [[User:Duskey|Duskey]] 20:29, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
== Progress on Traits ==
Right now, there are 20 pages in the Traits Category. They are:
[[Absent-Minded]],
[[Adventurous]],
[[Ambitious]],
[[Angler]],
[[Artistic]],
[[Athletic]],
[[Can't Stand Art]],
[[Commitment Issues]],
[[Couch Potato]],
[[Dramatic]],
[[Evil]],
[[Flirty]],
[[Kleptomaniac]],
[[Loser]],
[[Technophobe]],
[[Unflirty]],
[[Unlucky]],
[[Vegetarian]],
[[Virtuoso]],
[[Workaholic]]
Some trait pages are redirects to the list (they can be found by going to the 'what links here' page for List of Traits), and those traits are what I am going to work on next, to get those out of the way. Plus, after that, we can simply use the red links to determine which pages still need to be made. [[User:LostInRiverview|LostInRiverview]] 23:14, June 12, 2010 (UTC)
| |||