Talk:Veronaville: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
imported>K6ka
(Undid revision 637837 by Mucho gusta (Talk) not a discussion appropriate for an article talk page)
imported>K6ka
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 20:
 
:I think you should go to a chat page, not to the talk page. Talk pages are to discuss changes to the article itself, not to give personal opinions about the subject of the article. Bakerychaz, what if people don't want to know about what you think about Veronaville? You should be talking about stuff like changing the article, not your opinion about Veronaville. [[Special:Contributions/90.203.194.13|90.203.194.13]] ([[User talk:90.203.194.13|talk]]) 10:46, October 26, 2014 (UTC) '''Call me Summer! '''
 
:'''I thought that you weren't allowed to discuss your thoughts in talk pages. Nikel, you should be lecturing Bakerychaz like you usually do, it's against the rules.'''
<small>—Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:94.1.206.55|94.1.206.55]] ([[User talk:94.1.206.55|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/94.1.206.55|contribs]]) 18:33, February 25, 2015 (UTC) - [[Help:Signatures|Please sign your comments with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>]]</small>
 
::These comments are over two years old. Was it really necessary on your part to revive deceased discussions? --I am [[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] [[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF"><sup>Talk to me!</sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F"><sub>See what I have done</sub></span>]] 20:18, February 25, 2015 (UTC)
Anonymous user