The Sims Wiki:Requests for administratorship/Beds (June 2013): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>AsherÉire |
imported>Nicopmauad No edit summary |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:::Hana has been here for a while, never (as far as I know) vandalized, trolled, been blocked, or negatively used her editing tools. I am sure she wouldn't abuse the mighty admin powers. She wasn't allowed to be an admin before, and took it well. She is a great member of the wiki community. [[User:Hurshbr|Me!]]-[[User talk:Hurshbr|Bwahaha!]] 21:48, June 20, 2013 (UTC)Hurshbr |
:::Hana has been here for a while, never (as far as I know) vandalized, trolled, been blocked, or negatively used her editing tools. I am sure she wouldn't abuse the mighty admin powers. She wasn't allowed to be an admin before, and took it well. She is a great member of the wiki community. [[User:Hurshbr|Me!]]-[[User talk:Hurshbr|Bwahaha!]] 21:48, June 20, 2013 (UTC)Hurshbr |
||
In the previous admin request from Hana, I supported her strongly for the role, which I still do for the same reasons and more. The fact that Hana's editing history is still excellent to date impresses me, but it doesn't stand out compared to the fact of how well she accepted the decline of her previous application. I personally feel that having a request with a |
In the previous admin request from Hana, I supported her strongly for the role, which I still do for the same reasons and more. The fact that Hana's editing history is still excellent to date impresses me, but it doesn't stand out compared to the fact of how well she accepted the decline of her previous application. I personally feel that having a request with a divided consensus, whilst being declined would be harder to take than for the user to have a full house in terms of opposition votes. The fact that Hana accepted this so well does show that her maturity in certain situations has improved immensely. |
||
Now, some of the reasoning opposing Hana was due to her recent outbursts against a couple of users. Her behaviour since then has greatly improved, which shows that, without a doubt, that she has an appropriate state of mind to deal with situations requiring a clear head, compared to when she last requested this role. |
Now, some of the reasoning opposing Hana was due to her recent outbursts against a couple of users. Her behaviour since then has greatly improved, which shows that, without a doubt, that she has an appropriate state of mind to deal with situations requiring a clear head, compared to when she last requested this role. |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
To summarise, Hana's impact on the wiki has been enormous, and I feel she is ready to take on this role. I know she knows what she's doing, and I have complete faith in her ability to keep calm at all times. <font face="Courier (typeface)">[[User:AsherÉire|<font color="#74C365">Asher</font><font color="#FFA700">'''Éire'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:AsherÉire|'Sup?]]</small> </font> 15:54, June 21, 2013 (UTC) |
To summarise, Hana's impact on the wiki has been enormous, and I feel she is ready to take on this role. I know she knows what she's doing, and I have complete faith in her ability to keep calm at all times. <font face="Courier (typeface)">[[User:AsherÉire|<font color="#74C365">Asher</font><font color="#FFA700">'''Éire'''</font>]] <small>[[User talk:AsherÉire|'Sup?]]</small> </font> 15:54, June 21, 2013 (UTC) |
||
I agree with her being admin, I think she's a great user and therefore I think she would be an excellent admin, too. [[User:Nicopmauad|<span style="color:Green;">Nicolás</span>]] ([[User Talk:Nicopmauad|<span style="color:Blue;">Discusión</span>]]) 20:55, June 21, 2013 (UTC) |
|||