Anonymous user
The Sims Wiki:Requests for bureaucratship/K6ka (February 2015): Difference between revisions
The Sims Wiki:Requests for bureaucratship/K6ka (February 2015) (edit)
Revision as of 04:28, 3 February 2015
, 9 years ago→Discussion
imported>TehN00bishGal No edit summary |
imported>EpicJoyBoy |
||
Line 33:
Such overwhelming support. Should we close this as a successful one? [[User:Mathetesalexandrou|<span style="color:#00CC33">MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, </span><span style="color:#00AADD">FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, </span><span style="color:#88AAAA">SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES </span>]] ([[user talk:Mathetesalexandrou]]) 03:03, February 2, 2015 (UTC)
:Policy mandates five days of discussion at a minimum. At this time passage seems assured, but the five day minimum is intended to allow anyone who may object to the promotion ample time to make their opinion known. We typically would only close early if there's not a {{WP|WP:SNOW|snowball's chance}} of passage, and in that case we close mainly out of respect for the applicant/nominee. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] • [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 03:06, February 2, 2015 (UTC)
'''Support:''' My word is probably going to echo everybody else in this discussion, but aside from that K6ka is one of the most active users in this wiki, with over 9,000 edits, countless templates and discussions and certainly counting. And while I personally don't enjoy praising just about everything, there's nothing from me to say that he doesn't deserve this promotion. I'm sure he can put bureaucrat powers into good use. Congrats! [[User:EpicJoyBoy|<span style="color: #6900BF">'''EpicJoyBoy'''</span>]] [[User talk:EpicJoyBoy|<span style="color: #009CEB"><sup>''(My talk page!)''</sup></span>]] 04:28, February 3, 2015 (UTC)
| |||