Anonymous user
Forum:Merging compilation pack articles: Difference between revisions
→Discussion
imported>LostInRiverview (Created page with "{{Forumheader|Community discussions}} This is a follow-up to "Forum:Merging articles about TS1 compilations." In that thread, I sought a consensus to consolidate all the ...") |
imported>Beds |
||
Line 2:
This is a follow-up to "[[Forum:Merging articles about TS1 compilations|Merging articles about TS1 compilations]]." In that thread, I sought a consensus to consolidate all the compilations for ''[[The Sims]]'' into one article. Within that thread, it was proposed (and supported by some people) that we do the same with compilations for ''[[The Sims 2]]'' and ''[[The Sims 3]]'' as well. Since that initial thread dealt specifically with ''TS1'' compilations, I decided to start this thread to see if we want to do this to the ''TS2'' and ''TS3'' articles as well. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 18:54, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
==Discussion==
Sticking with what I said in the last forum discussion on this topic, I think we should merge all compilation pack articles by generation as it saves other users from trailing through many articles to find the pack they're looking for. It also reduces the amount of cluttered articles. [[User:Beds|<font color="#6B1D51">'''Beds'''</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:Beds|<font color="#512d17">'''parlare'''</font>]] - [[User_blog:Beds|<font color="#512d17">'''da leggere'''</font>]])</sup> 19:22, August 6, 2013 (UTC)
| |||