Anonymous user
Forum:TS4 Sim articles: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
imported>C.Syde65 |
imported>EpicJoyBoy No edit summary |
||
Line 4:
Still, there are officially confirmed Sims such as [[Bella Goth|Bella]] and [[Mortimer Goth]] and then there's also a whole slew of promotional TS4 Sims, such as [[Babs O'Amour]] and [[Ollie Perdue]] available in the [[gallery]] if you have the [[Create a Sim]] demo. What do you think on this matter? [[User:EpicJoyBoy|<span style="color: #6900BF">'''EpicJoyBoy'''</span>]] [[User talk:EpicJoyBoy|<span style="color: #009CEB"><sup>''(My talk page!)''</sup></span>]] 08:15, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
:EDIT: [https://twitter.com/SimGuruGraham/status/490627394626007040 SimGuruGraham said there will be a blog article coming up about families in ''The Sims 4'']. We could add Sim articles after that, though I'm still lenient on adding it only after TS4 is released. [[User:EpicJoyBoy|<span style="color: #6900BF">'''EpicJoyBoy'''</span>]] [[User talk:EpicJoyBoy|<span style="color: #009CEB"><sup>''(My talk page!)''</sup></span>]] 11:34, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
==Discussion==
I assume that any Sims shown in-game in the demos are likely to be in the game at launch, but I agree with your point. Perhaps it would be best to hold off on creating articles for these Sims, if for no other reason than that they haven't really been "confirmed" to be in the game. If they're Sims that don't seem to have any relation to existing Sims or any previous appearances in the series, they could just as easily be "example" Sims added to populate the world only to be removed before launch, or Sims brought in from the Gallery who aren't actually "canon". So, I '''agree''' with your proposal. - '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 08:33, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
| |||