Anonymous user
Forum:RFA reform: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m
Reverted edits by BucktonyVI (talk | block) to last version by C.Syde65
imported>BucktonyVI No edit summary |
imported>K6ka m (Reverted edits by BucktonyVI (talk | block) to last version by C.Syde65) |
||
Line 33:
::I like this way, as it works well on Wikipedia, but I don't think there is enough users involved in the community side of the wiki for this to work - let's take [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/RickinBaltimore this] request for example: that very request had 203 users vote on that user becoming an administrator. We don't have that number of currently ''active'' editors, most of them not participating in discussions, either. I just don't think it would suit TSW, ''yet''. I would hope that it does one day, as the system does work. ~ [[User:Beds|<font color="purple">'''Beds'''</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:Beds|<font color="#66CDAA">'''talk'''</font>]] - [[User_blog:Beds|<font color="#66CDAA">'''blog'''</font>]])</sup> 19:06, December 1, 2016 (UTC)
:::It sounds like a good idea to me, although I'm not entirely certain whether or not it would pay off, given that the social side of the wiki has dropped significantly over the last year. ― <span style="font-family:'Constantia'; font-weight:bold; font-size:108%;">[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]</span> <span style="font-family:'Adobe Garamond Pro'; font-size:108%;">([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]])</span> 21:29, December 1, 2016 (UTC)
|