Talk:DeAndre Wolfe: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>LostInRiverview |
imported>Eduardog3000 |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:::::::::For the love of god, if they are not on their family tree or not even mentioned, THAN THEY ARE NOT RELATED. I really hate how so many users assume somebody is related to someone else, because, they have the same last name, or they simply look alike. It's really sad. {{AurorSig}} |
:::::::::For the love of god, if they are not on their family tree or not even mentioned, THAN THEY ARE NOT RELATED. I really hate how so many users assume somebody is related to someone else, because, they have the same last name, or they simply look alike. It's really sad. {{AurorSig}} |
||
::::::::::Here's a timely and perfect example. In elementary school I had a teacher named Mrs. Wolff (no joke). There was another teacher named Mrs. Wolf. Similar names, yes; but they were not related. There is no reason here to assume any different. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 18:25, October 31, 2010 (UTC) |
::::::::::Here's a timely and perfect example. In elementary school I had a teacher named Mrs. Wolff (no joke). There was another teacher named Mrs. Wolf. Similar names, yes; but they were not related. There is no reason here to assume any different. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 18:25, October 31, 2010 (UTC) |
||
Ok, as for the black and white thing, one of the whites that changed to Wolfe could've married a black, and their child married a black, eventually leading up to DeAndre. As for Mrs. Wolff and Mrs. Wolf, first of all that is not their maiden names so they may not be related, but their husbands (Mr. Wolff and Mr. Wolf) are most likely ('''very''' distantly) related.--[[w:c:sims:User:Eduardog3000|Eduardog]][[User_Talk:Eduardog3000|3000]] 18:55, October 31, 2010 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 18:55, 31 October 2010
This page needs to be moved to "DeAndre Wolfe" because that is the proper in-game spelling.--Eduardog3000 16:59, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
I've tried to move but it don't let me to :(. -----Guilherme Guerreiro 17:12, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
That is why i put that here for an admin to help.--Eduardog3000 17:16, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
- You can use Template:Move for that or no one will see it. --Duskeytalk 19:36, September 18, 2010 (UTC)
Relation to Wolff family
someone keeps removing the part about his possible relation to the Wolff family, now the page has been protected, that part should be there.--Eduardog3000 17:40, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- No it shouldn't. Why should it? - JEA13 [iTalk] 17:41, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Why shouldn't it? It is the same as when there is a grave with a last name that is the same as another Sim but the family tree says nothing, we put it on here as a possible relation. Ex: Steel family.--Eduardog3000 17:44, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Just because two people have similar last names doesn't mean they share any relation. For example, two people with the last names 'Peterson' and 'Petersen' by your logic are somehow related. There is no in-game reason given to assume that the two are related, so the info should stay off, in my personal opinion. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog 17:44, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Like the deleted part stated, in real-life sometimes the spelling of last names change over time, one branch of the family could've changed to Wolff, while the other changed to Wolfe.--Eduardog3000 18:04, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- And how come you say that is the case when you do know it isn't? - JEA13 [iTalk] 18:07, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not saying it is the case, I am saying it could be the case.--Eduardog3000 18:11, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, but it's not the case, because it is never the case, because there are never any signs or clues indicating so. - JEA13 [iTalk] 18:12, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Just because a name can change over time doesn't mean that it did change. And without any evidence to say, or even hint, that there is a relation aside from the similarity of the name, there is absolutely no reason to add this information. And, while I hate to be the guy to say it, DeAndre Wolfe is black and the Wolffs are white - the chances of them being even distantly related is pretty slim. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog 18:22, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- For the love of god, if they are not on their family tree or not even mentioned, THAN THEY ARE NOT RELATED. I really hate how so many users assume somebody is related to someone else, because, they have the same last name, or they simply look alike. It's really sad. [Ѧüя◎ґ]
- Here's a timely and perfect example. In elementary school I had a teacher named Mrs. Wolff (no joke). There was another teacher named Mrs. Wolf. Similar names, yes; but they were not related. There is no reason here to assume any different. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog 18:25, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- For the love of god, if they are not on their family tree or not even mentioned, THAN THEY ARE NOT RELATED. I really hate how so many users assume somebody is related to someone else, because, they have the same last name, or they simply look alike. It's really sad. [Ѧüя◎ґ]
- Just because a name can change over time doesn't mean that it did change. And without any evidence to say, or even hint, that there is a relation aside from the similarity of the name, there is absolutely no reason to add this information. And, while I hate to be the guy to say it, DeAndre Wolfe is black and the Wolffs are white - the chances of them being even distantly related is pretty slim. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog 18:22, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, but it's not the case, because it is never the case, because there are never any signs or clues indicating so. - JEA13 [iTalk] 18:12, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm not saying it is the case, I am saying it could be the case.--Eduardog3000 18:11, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- And how come you say that is the case when you do know it isn't? - JEA13 [iTalk] 18:07, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Like the deleted part stated, in real-life sometimes the spelling of last names change over time, one branch of the family could've changed to Wolff, while the other changed to Wolfe.--Eduardog3000 18:04, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Just because two people have similar last names doesn't mean they share any relation. For example, two people with the last names 'Peterson' and 'Petersen' by your logic are somehow related. There is no in-game reason given to assume that the two are related, so the info should stay off, in my personal opinion. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog 17:44, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Why shouldn't it? It is the same as when there is a grave with a last name that is the same as another Sim but the family tree says nothing, we put it on here as a possible relation. Ex: Steel family.--Eduardog3000 17:44, October 31, 2010 (UTC)
Ok, as for the black and white thing, one of the whites that changed to Wolfe could've married a black, and their child married a black, eventually leading up to DeAndre. As for Mrs. Wolff and Mrs. Wolf, first of all that is not their maiden names so they may not be related, but their husbands (Mr. Wolff and Mr. Wolf) are most likely (very distantly) related.--Eduardog3000 18:55, October 31, 2010 (UTC)