Talk:The Sims 3: Difference between revisions
imported>CA Quakes m (→Split Request (Sims): new section) |
imported>CA Quakes |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:Questions on [[The Sims (series)]] is mostly answered in our forum, you might have better luck there: [[Forum:Central Park]]. '''[[User:Duskey|Duskey]]'''<small>([[User_talk:Duskey|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]])</small> 23:09, July 23, 2010 (UTC) |
:Questions on [[The Sims (series)]] is mostly answered in our forum, you might have better luck there: [[Forum:Central Park]]. '''[[User:Duskey|Duskey]]'''<small>([[User_talk:Duskey|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]])</small> 23:09, July 23, 2010 (UTC) |
||
== Split |
== Split Requests == |
||
Hey everyone. I believe that |
Hey everyone. I believe that some of the sections of this article should be split into numerous articles. I have split it down for you because this can be understood and be more appropriate for us to talk about these separate articles that can be split. Thanks [[User:CA Quakes|CA Quakes]] 22:47, November 23, 2010 (UTC) |
||
===Sims=== |
|||
The overall view of "Sim" should be separate. The sim section is better suited for an overall article. If it stays it will look long. I truly believe in this split |
|||
===System requirements=== |
|||
The system requirements should be separate from this because it can and will change. This applies to The Sims and The Sims 2 games as well. All three game series system specs should be highlighted into one article. |
|||
===Expansions and subsequent sections=== |
|||
The expansion packs and few other articles should be included for its own article; like The Sims 2 stuff packs should be listed as one. Or I could be wrong but it sounds redundant enough for me, my honest thoughts. |
|||
Revision as of 22:47, 23 November 2010
 |
Engine
Does anyone know if the Sims 3 engine has a name? It's not propietary, that was someone misunderstanding the words in an article and Sims 3 isn't listed under games with Renderware on wikipedia. Duskey(talk)(blog) 10:14, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- It used to say RenderWare on WP but it got removed. It's possible though. GEORGIEGIBBONS 17:05, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
Haha!
Did anybody else notice that on the Sims 3 came case on the main pg, you can see a young Mortimer above the 's' in Sims? He gets caught off though. There is also a younger-looking Corneilia to the left of a stern-looking officer. oh! And an evil-smiling child girl at the bottom right corner near the 'EA" sign. Then a nicer one next to a black lady on a phone above. Hehe....Sims can be so funny.. -- 24.131.224.165 20:32, July 20, 2010 (UTC)
Does The Sims 3 console have the ageing system and kids?
Q: Same as the headline. GEORGIEGIBBONS 17:04, July 21, 2010 (UTC)
- Questions on The Sims (series) is mostly answered in our forum, you might have better luck there: Forum:Central Park. Duskey(talk) 23:09, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
Split Requests
Hey everyone. I believe that some of the sections of this article should be split into numerous articles. I have split it down for you because this can be understood and be more appropriate for us to talk about these separate articles that can be split. Thanks CA Quakes 22:47, November 23, 2010 (UTC)
Sims
The overall view of "Sim" should be separate. The sim section is better suited for an overall article. If it stays it will look long. I truly believe in this split
System requirements
The system requirements should be separate from this because it can and will change. This applies to The Sims and The Sims 2 games as well. All three game series system specs should be highlighted into one article.
Expansions and subsequent sections
The expansion packs and few other articles should be included for its own article; like The Sims 2 stuff packs should be listed as one. Or I could be wrong but it sounds redundant enough for me, my honest thoughts.