The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/Singer (service): Difference between revisions
imported>K6ka |
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
'''Keep''' This deletion nomination seems to exist in lieu of proper article expansion, which doesn't sit very well with me. Deletion should be a last resort in these cases: in most other cases, expansion, redirection, or merging are much better solutions. —[[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁</span> ([[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF">Talk</span>]] · [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F">Contributions</span>]]) 19:48, January 12, 2019 (UTC) |
'''Keep''' This deletion nomination seems to exist in lieu of proper article expansion, which doesn't sit very well with me. Deletion should be a last resort in these cases: in most other cases, expansion, redirection, or merging are much better solutions. —[[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁</span> ([[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF">Talk</span>]] · [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F">Contributions</span>]]) 19:48, January 12, 2019 (UTC) |
||
'''Keep and wait''' I agree with k6; I think expansion is preferable to deletion. That said, the content of the page is a single sentence currently, and from what I can tell, no attempt has been made to expand it since it was originally created. I would support keeping the article, removing the delete tag, and seeing if that spurs anyone into developing the page. If after a good length of time there has been no forward progress (either because there is no interest in developing the page or because there is no additional information to add), then we can re-consider deletion. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<span style="color:navy;">LostInRiverview</span>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] · [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]] · [[Special:Contributions/LostInRiverview|<font color="green">contribs</font>]]</sup>''' 15:34, May 28, 2019 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 15:34, 28 May 2019
← Pages for Deletion | ← Open deletion discussions
Page(s) for deletion: Singer (service)
Any member of the wiki may participate in a deletion discussion. Comments during discussion should focus on why the article should or should not be deleted, merged, or modified. Users should explain their reasoning sufficiently. Deletion discussions are not votes; strength of argument matters more than the number of people in favor or opposed to deletion.
Discussion[edit source]
This page has been nominated for deletion by DrakonoSkerdikas with the following message: "little to no information ; hardly anything insightful apart from the obvious, that's already listed in Service." I honestly think this page could be expanded to have more information. Like what do they do? How much do they cost? And so on. I think this page deserves a chance. - SimDestroyer (talk) 15:44, November 15, 2018 (UTC)
Same reasons that simdestroyer provided. Cheseburgermac (talk) 15:56, January 2, 2019 (UTC)
Keep This deletion nomination seems to exist in lieu of proper article expansion, which doesn't sit very well with me. Deletion should be a last resort in these cases: in most other cases, expansion, redirection, or merging are much better solutions. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 19:48, January 12, 2019 (UTC)
Keep and wait I agree with k6; I think expansion is preferable to deletion. That said, the content of the page is a single sentence currently, and from what I can tell, no attempt has been made to expand it since it was originally created. I would support keeping the article, removing the delete tag, and seeing if that spurs anyone into developing the page. If after a good length of time there has been no forward progress (either because there is no interest in developing the page or because there is no additional information to add), then we can re-consider deletion. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 15:34, May 28, 2019 (UTC)