User talk:Mate1234
|
Power aspiration
Please stop inserting Power to Sims with no aspiration! I've said it twice, here and here. Please do NOT insert any more of this because we haven't known the validity of the Power aspiration! You keep ignoring the fact that we cannot be sure about this aspiration yet. If you need to rebut this, please discuss it first in Talk:Power (aspiration), or we'll be considered to start edit warring. Nikel Talk – Vote! 05:11, June 19, 2013 (UTC)
RE: Editing mistake
Hello! :) Well, if you think of it: the mistake is the game recognizing them as male, not the appearance being female. Because when the developers created such Sims, they were supposed to be female, but somehow they are not recognized as such and because of that they act like males or adults, but that's not how it should be. Do you agree? --RoseGui (talk here) 14:04, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
They have female appearances, but we edit them as male adults, because game recognizes them as male adults. Mate1234 (talk ) 15:07, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think we don't need to be that strict. If we know it's a mistake, isn't this category good enough for that? --RoseGui (talk here) 14:10, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
- It´s best to write correct, just like in game, if she is actually male, then write that she is male. Mate1234
- Thing is, not many people are aware at this, and if there's a reader taking a quick glance, they will be confused for sure; and might even try to "correct" the article again because what's seen is clearly a child. That is why it's stated explicitly in the article itself, because article is to read, and why there's the Category:Gender confused Sims. Nikel Talk – Vote! 14:33, June 22, 2013 (UTC)
- In the text is written: ˝Though she has female child appearence, game recognizes her as male adult...˝ That explains everything. Mate1234