Forum:VisualEditor discussion: Difference between revisions
imported>K6ka No edit summary |
imported>Beds No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
{{VoteAgainst}} '''Oppose''' - The VisualEditor has been nothing but trouble so far. It has been notoriously breaking articles, such as removing links, text bold/italics, wreaking havoc on tables, randomly removing templates (especially maintenance or cleanup tags), and often leaving tons of useless HTML code or orphaned tags (e.g. <nowiki>''''''</nowiki>). It also doesn't work with [[The Sims Wiki:Battles]]; instead of four tildes transforming into a signature, four tildes is wrapped with <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki> tags, becoming completely useless. I've been told VisualEditor was enabled for anonymous users by default so "More user feedback could be collected", but it leaves more experienced users out in the cold, or just leaving them to spend more time cleaning up after the mess VE makes. Completely unacceptable. --I am [[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] [[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF"><sup>Talk to me!</sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F"><sub>See what I have done</sub></span>]] 02:33, October 12, 2014 (UTC) |
{{VoteAgainst}} '''Oppose''' - The VisualEditor has been nothing but trouble so far. It has been notoriously breaking articles, such as removing links, text bold/italics, wreaking havoc on tables, randomly removing templates (especially maintenance or cleanup tags), and often leaving tons of useless HTML code or orphaned tags (e.g. <nowiki>''''''</nowiki>). It also doesn't work with [[The Sims Wiki:Battles]]; instead of four tildes transforming into a signature, four tildes is wrapped with <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki> tags, becoming completely useless. I've been told VisualEditor was enabled for anonymous users by default so "More user feedback could be collected", but it leaves more experienced users out in the cold, or just leaving them to spend more time cleaning up after the mess VE makes. Completely unacceptable. --I am [[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] [[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF"><sup>Talk to me!</sup></span>]] [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F"><sub>See what I have done</sub></span>]] 02:33, October 12, 2014 (UTC) |
||
{{Neutral}} '''Neutral''' ~ I have to agree with k6ka on the fact that VE has messed up a lot of articles, and it has caused quite a hassle. What with all of the cleaning up we've had to undergo recently. However, I am open to hearing other's opinions on the matter and there is, most likely, someone who is a fan of the new editor. There is a small chance I might change my mind, but for now, I'm neutral towards the editor. [[User:Beds|<font color="#6B1D51">'''Beds'''</font>]] <sup>([[User_talk:Beds|<font color="#512d17">'''talk'''</font>]] - [[User_blog:Beds|<font color="#512d17">'''blog'''</font>]])</sup> 21:36, October 16, 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 21:36, 16 October 2014
The Sims Wiki's Site Feature Policy requires that all new non-MediaWiki updates to Wikia be disabled by default on The Sims Wiki. Wikia Staff have been developing a new "VisualEditor" that will (eventually) replace the RTE/"WYSIWYG" editor. This change will directly affect all unregistered users, and any user that uses the default editor settings in their user preferences, and may have an indirect effect on articles, as the new VE does function differently in some ways from the RTE.
The Site Feature Policy requires that this feature be disabled automatically here as soon as it goes live to all of Wikia. This discussion is intended to allow users to comment locally on the new feature, and to indicate whether they support its adoption or not. If the local community does not indicate support for the new feature, myself and other members of The Sims Wiki's admin team will contact Staff and attempt to get the feature disabled, in line with the SFP. So, if you want the new feature to be rolled-out here, be sure to mention so below.
What does everyone think about this? - LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 00:53, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
Neutral (leaning towards slight support) - The principle of the new VE is that it's supposed to correct a lot of the nagging issues in the RTE. Preliminary information suggests that the VE is marginally better than the RTE and marginally less likely to cause problems on the pages it's used on. But ultimately, I'm not going to use the new VE anyways, so I'm not personally directly affected by Wikia's plans to change it. -- LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 00:53, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
Oppose - The VisualEditor has been nothing but trouble so far. It has been notoriously breaking articles, such as removing links, text bold/italics, wreaking havoc on tables, randomly removing templates (especially maintenance or cleanup tags), and often leaving tons of useless HTML code or orphaned tags (e.g. ''''''). It also doesn't work with The Sims Wiki:Battles; instead of four tildes transforming into a signature, four tildes is wrapped with <nowiki> tags, becoming completely useless. I've been told VisualEditor was enabled for anonymous users by default so "More user feedback could be collected", but it leaves more experienced users out in the cold, or just leaving them to spend more time cleaning up after the mess VE makes. Completely unacceptable. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 02:33, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
Neutral ~ I have to agree with k6ka on the fact that VE has messed up a lot of articles, and it has caused quite a hassle. What with all of the cleaning up we've had to undergo recently. However, I am open to hearing other's opinions on the matter and there is, most likely, someone who is a fan of the new editor. There is a small chance I might change my mind, but for now, I'm neutral towards the editor. Beds (talk - blog) 21:36, October 16, 2014 (UTC)