Talk:Twinbrook: Difference between revisions
imported>Thelamppost No edit summary |
imported>Guffers |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I am really hoping this info is fake Skip Broke as a child is bad enough but Notzo Curious as a toddler! This is just ridiculous.--[[User:Thelamppost|Thelamppost]] 00:20, May 30, 2010 (UTC) |
I am really hoping this info is fake Skip Broke as a child is bad enough but Notzo Curious as a toddler! This is just ridiculous.--[[User:Thelamppost|Thelamppost]] 00:20, May 30, 2010 (UTC) |
||
It isn't a fake, it has been confirmed. It may have something to do with the new [[Time Machine]], that seems to be EA's main excuse now. Maybe it says something in the family bio or Twinbrook could be at a totally different time frame from [[Riverview]] an [[Sunset Valley]]. --[[User:Guffers|Guffers]] 09:27, May 31, 2010 (UTC) |
|||
== == |
== == |
||
Revision as of 09:27, 31 May 2010
Young Notzo?
I am really hoping this info is fake Skip Broke as a child is bad enough but Notzo Curious as a toddler! This is just ridiculous.--Thelamppost 00:20, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
It isn't a fake, it has been confirmed. It may have something to do with the new Time Machine, that seems to be EA's main excuse now. Maybe it says something in the family bio or Twinbrook could be at a totally different time frame from Riverview an Sunset Valley. --Guffers 09:27, May 31, 2010 (UTC)
Unless that quote from Rodiek is machine translated, I think it's fabricated. I can't find a source for it anywhere at all, and the bad grammer ('amount' instead of 'number', etc) points to a vandal.
(Kiwi tea 04:03, May 23, 2010 (UTC))
Deleting Sections?
I have to question the purpose of having a section for possibly returning families, as well as a section for lots, as both at this point seem highly speculative. However, with about a week left to release, it hardly seems like a major issue, does it? LostInRiverview 07:50, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
Those sections were add to mirror the other pages, and so that as info flowed in from fan events they could be filled with sourced information. Unfortunately, one particular vandal has decided to make a campaign of adding the families they wish were returning, possibly to shout the fabricated news on the official forums. It's no speculation that there will be returning families - Rodiek has confirmed we'll see 'some old faces'. It's just totally speculative as to who those might be. Maybe you're right now.(121.73.162.112 10:08, May 25, 2010 (UTC))