The Sims Wiki talk:Admin Portal: Difference between revisions
imported>CookieMonster888 |
imported>CookieMonster888 |
||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
Since this persons 1 month block was up, they tried to provoke a response from administrators by posting about their previous vandalism [http://sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User:RIPBrandibroke&oldid=168591] [http://sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_blog:RIPBrandibroke/hello&oldid=168092]. When that didn't work they started trolling Monster, including a threat to "ban" him [http://sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Monster2821&diff=prev&oldid=168590] [http://sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Monster2821&diff=prev&oldid=170024]. [[User:RIPBrandibroke|RIPBrandibroke]] was blocked on June 7 2010 for 1 week for vandalising articles with "fanon" and on July 5 2010, this time for 1 month, for the same thing [http://sims.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Block/RIPBrandibroke]. Monster has as of today blocked them for 1 year, but I would like to suggest a permanent block based on that I do not think this user has any interest in redeeming themself. I would also suggest that the vandal bragging on the user page and blog be deleted. '''[[User:Duskey|Duskey]]'''<small>([[User_talk:Duskey|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]])</small> 11:57, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
Since this persons 1 month block was up, they tried to provoke a response from administrators by posting about their previous vandalism [http://sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User:RIPBrandibroke&oldid=168591] [http://sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_blog:RIPBrandibroke/hello&oldid=168092]. When that didn't work they started trolling Monster, including a threat to "ban" him [http://sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Monster2821&diff=prev&oldid=168590] [http://sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=User_talk:Monster2821&diff=prev&oldid=170024]. [[User:RIPBrandibroke|RIPBrandibroke]] was blocked on June 7 2010 for 1 week for vandalising articles with "fanon" and on July 5 2010, this time for 1 month, for the same thing [http://sims.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Block/RIPBrandibroke]. Monster has as of today blocked them for 1 year, but I would like to suggest a permanent block based on that I do not think this user has any interest in redeeming themself. I would also suggest that the vandal bragging on the user page and blog be deleted. '''[[User:Duskey|Duskey]]'''<small>([[User_talk:Duskey|<span style="color:green;">talk</span>]])</small> 11:57, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
||
I already perma. blocked him.--[[user:Monster2821| Danny (Monster2821)]]<small> ([[user talk:Monster2821|talk]])([[special:random|random page]])</small> 12:00, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
I already perma. blocked him.--[[user:Monster2821| Danny (Monster2821)]]<small> ([[user talk:Monster2821|talk]])([[special:random|random page]])</small> 12:00, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
||
i think he has a sock puppet to.--[[user:Monster2821| Danny (Monster2821)]]<small> ([[user talk:Monster2821|talk]])([[special:random|random page]])</small> 12:09, August 23, 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:09, 23 August 2010
Digimon spam
Original article from development portal talk:
I found this http://sims.wikia.com/index.php?title=Pleasant_family&diff=155672&oldid=155669 and reverted it of course. I did not warn or ban since the user has made no other contributions, I'll keep an eye on it of course. I can remember removing the same spam from another article some days ago from another IP. I asked some of the VSTF staff if we could watch for these keywords somehow, without any luck. Just a quick reminder: Keep a lookout for spam like this. Duskey(talk) 14:25, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- No, I have found the same text in thousands (not literally) pages today. I didn't check if it was from the same person.- JEA13 [iTalk] 19:20, July 22, 2010 (UTC)
- I say we block if it happens twice from the same IP, though I'm almost sure it's just some proxy servers from all over the world. The one in my example is from Indonesia. Duskey(talk) 00:32, July 23, 2010 (UTC)
- I think the best we can do is use google to search for 'digimon' with the 'site:http://sims.wikia.com' paremeter. It only shows this page atm, but it appears the spanish sims wiki has had the same problems. Duskey(talk) 07:20, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
- I blocked 118.137.68.185 for a month. The IP's seem to be from 118.137.x.x range, but we sadly also have legitimate IP users posting from that range so we cannot ban them all. Duskey(talk) 07:26, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Previously blocked 118.137.20.48 as well. Duskey(talk) 07:53, August 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Moved article to admin portal talk. Duskey(talk) 14:55, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- If we see more of this Digimon spam from the 118.137.x.x range, I suggest we block IP users from that range for a month, as a test. Normal contributors can from that range will still be able to register and then contribute as normal, but IP's from that range will not be able to edit. What do you think? Duskey(talk) 14:55, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think vandalism even of this type or magnitude warrants potentially blocking several people who have done nothing wrong, just because they coincidentally have an IP address that falls within a certain range. If this continues, though, it might be best to send a message to someone on the VSTF, since maybe they have an idea that will stop it, without possibly barring innocent users. Plus, to be honest, while this sort of thing is a nuisance, it doesn't do any real or permanent harm, since it's revertible and those users can be blocked. -- Patrick (LostInRiverview) (talk)(blog)(random page) 15:48, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
- If we see more of this Digimon spam from the 118.137.x.x range, I suggest we block IP users from that range for a month, as a test. Normal contributors can from that range will still be able to register and then contribute as normal, but IP's from that range will not be able to edit. What do you think? Duskey(talk) 14:55, August 5, 2010 (UTC)
Users | First active | Last active | Last admin action | Pages |
---|---|---|---|---|
118.137.20.218 (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log) | July 22 | July 22 | None | Pleasant family, Goth family |
118.137.20.48 (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log) | July 31 | July 31 | 1 day block | Trap,The Sims 3: World Adventures,The Sims 3: Ambitions |
118.137.68.185 (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log) | August 1 | August 1 | 1 month block | Vampire, Trap, The Sims 3: Ambitions, The Sims 3: World Adventures |
118.137.57.130 (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log) | August 22 | August 22 | 1 week block | The Sims 3: World Adventures, Trap |
Pages | Hits |
---|---|
The Sims 3: World Adventures | 3 |
Trap | 3 |
The Sims 3: Ambitions | 2 |
Pleasant family | 1 |
Goth family | 1 |
Vampire | 1 |
- Common factors
-
- 118.137.x.x IP's
- Goes for popular pages.
- So far not from the same IP.
- Ways to prevent
Action Pros Cons Range block 118.137.x.x anon users only Will probably stop it A very large range
- What to do now
-
- Discuss the issue and come up with countermeasures.
- Check history and try to find more incidents for comparison.
- Admins follow targeted pages.
- Continued discussion
Thoughts, questions, ideas? As mentioned above I've asked some people from VSTF and they suggested the range block. Duskey(talk) 08:29, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
Site Notice
I've temporarily pulled the Site Notice, since we've had a drop in the number of articles, and best practices suggests keeping messages only on a temporary basis. If you disagree, or notice the article count start to climb again (to within 10, probably), please feel free to revert my edit and reintroduce the countdown. -- Patrick (LostInRiverview) (talk)(blog)(random page) 16:35, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- If you do not change the sitenotice ID aswell it doesn't make much sense to clear the sitenotice unless the information gets outdated or invalid. If people dismissed the message they obviously won't see it. If people did not dismiss it, they probably don't mind it or like to keep it in order to keep up with the article count. LIR has re-enabled it already btw. Duskey(talk) 20:35, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
Warnings
I'd like to make a few changes to the way we handle warnings, and specifically the {{warning}} and {{warning2}} templates. Presently, we really only have two types of warnings; one for unconstructive edits, and another for negative behavior. I think it would be better to get rid of Warning2 and combine both into the Warning template, with the addition of another parameter. So, entering a warning would look something like this:
{{subst:warning |type=spam |reason=inserting advertisements in an article |~~~~ }}
or
{{subst:warning |type=harassment |reason=attacking another user |~~~~ }}
or
{{subst:warning |type=final |reason=continuing to insert nonsense into articles |~~~~ }}
It could be set up to where there is a preset list of types which will produce a warning with different text, images and/or colors.
On a related note, Wikipedia has a policy adopted about removing comments from user talk pages; it says that messages on talk pages shouldn't be re-added if removed, as doing so would force a user to keep a badge of shame. I think this is reasonable, so I'd also like to remove any requirement to keep warnings on user talk pages. Since everything is still kept in edit history, it wouldn't be difficult to determine whether someone has already been warned. -- Patrick (LostInRiverview) (talk)(blog)(random page) 17:27, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
- It sounds good to me, thumbs up. I also support the idea of scrapping the 1 week rule of not deleting the warning. As long as people issueing the warning put 'warning' in the edit summary, we can always spot it if need be. Duskey(talk) 22:53, August 10, 2010 (UTC)
TSW on other sites
Moved from the community portal talk
Discussion
Should we register TSW on other sites? I'm thinking facebook and twitter and all that. I'm gonna list some pros and cons:
- Pros
- Might attract more visitors.
- Can help relay info without people visiting the site.
- Cons
- Shared password.
- Abuse/vandalism.
- Inter-admin drama for not gaining access to accounts.
- Suggested sites
- Google Groups (for sharing passwords between admins)
- Youtube
- Comments
Personally I'm not a facebook man so I can't comment much on that, but I am beginning to see the advantages of Twitter. We could use it to post whenver we put up a blog post which goes in 'The Sims Wiki News' window, this means people following us on Twitter would get an update without having to check the site. It also means people can follow us vis RSS. At the moment our RSS feed is a standard 'recent changes' enabled by default by Wikia. Additionally we can use it for more general Sims 3 news as well, such as 'The Sims 3: Late Night announced, info available on the wiki' or something like that. I'd certainly be up for it. I already registered a Twitter account with our name in my email. If we do go ahead and adopt this idea, we'll probably need a joint email as well. Duskey(talk) 21:30, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
The problem with all this is that is encourages stuff going on behind closed doors, which is really against the whole wiki concept, but I can see where it will come in handy. So far for affiliates I've been using my own email, but we could use a joint on as well. Another problem is, who do we give access to those servies? I mean the email and the twitter. Who should get the password? And I can already foresee the complaints about there being a 'club' within the administrator ranks which new admins might feel excluded from since they do not have access to the same tools as other admins do. Duskey(talk) 21:30, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
Yet another hurdle is vandalism or abuse. We need administrators to keep on eye on these external services to prevent abuse and how do we handle it if an admin with password for the stuff goes rogue. I'm quite sure we would be unable to retrieve the accounts. Duskey(talk) 21:30, July 28, 2010 (UTC)
Another thing: We'll need a place where we can share the passwords of these accounts. Nicmavr has suggested Google groups, so all you need a is a google account to join. Duskey(talk) 14:54, July 29, 2010 (UTC)
I added 'suggested sites' above. Duskey(talk) 12:57, July 31, 2010 (UTC)
I've made a Twitter so you can preview it: http://twitter.com/thesimswiki I even pimped it out in our colors etc. Duskey(talk) 08:18, August 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Twitter page looks good. I have been posting to Facebook with Wikia's Facebook Connect. --a_morris (talk) 19:05, August 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Moved from the community portal discussion. Duskey(talk) 14:35, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- Created The Sims Wiki:Admin Portal/sites. Duskey(talk) 15:31, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
The next step
What's the next step? The way I see it we just use Twitter to announce our news posting which go on the main page. Remember to include links directly to the post in Bit.ly format. Facebook should probably contain similar postings, I have no idea how that works though (Facebook that is).
The Google group is only used so all invited admins have the passwords. The Gmail is only used since all these sites (Twitter, Bit.ly etc) required an email to register. It should only be used for affiliation emails. It should not be used as a contact email, we have the wiki for that.
Personally I would hold off announcing all this until we get it on the right tracks, meaning all active 'crats control the google group and we make some userboxes like "I'm following TSW on Twitter" etc. Duskey(talk) 15:50, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- I've created a Facebook page for The Sims Wiki and linked (export Facebook posts to Twitter) it to our Twitter account. I am the admin of the page but I can add others through Facebook friends or email. --a_morris (talk) 18:46, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
- The page that was linked here before was not "owned" by anyone and therefore could not be posted to or administered in anyway. The second one is administered by me so far. I'm not positive if twitter posts will show up on facebook. It is either facebook -> twitter or facebook <-> twitter. --a_morris (talk) 21:30, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Like Button code
Like Button code:
<fb:like href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Sims-Wiki/126686564044617"></fb:like>
<fb:like href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Sims-Wiki/126686564044617"></fb:like>
or <fb:like href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Sims-Wiki/126686564044617" layout="button_count"></fb:like>
<fb:like href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Sims-Wiki/126686564044617" layout="button_count"></fb:like>
RIPBrandibroke
Since this persons 1 month block was up, they tried to provoke a response from administrators by posting about their previous vandalism [1] [2]. When that didn't work they started trolling Monster, including a threat to "ban" him [3] [4]. RIPBrandibroke was blocked on June 7 2010 for 1 week for vandalising articles with "fanon" and on July 5 2010, this time for 1 month, for the same thing [5]. Monster has as of today blocked them for 1 year, but I would like to suggest a permanent block based on that I do not think this user has any interest in redeeming themself. I would also suggest that the vandal bragging on the user page and blog be deleted. Duskey(talk) 11:57, August 23, 2010 (UTC) I already perma. blocked him.-- Danny (Monster2821) (talk)(random page) 12:00, August 23, 2010 (UTC) i think he has a sock puppet to.-- Danny (Monster2821) (talk)(random page) 12:09, August 23, 2010 (UTC)