Forum:TS4 Sim articles: Difference between revisions

From The Sims Wiki, a collaborative database for The Sims series
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>EpicJoyBoy
No edit summary
imported>Auror Andrachome
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:


Per above. -- '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] &#124; [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 08:36, July 20, 2014 (UTC)
Per above. -- '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] &#124; [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 08:36, July 20, 2014 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree, considering {{{Sim4}}} is still disallowed for article use and is still in the testing phase. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 01:27, July 31, 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:27, 31 July 2014

Forums: IndexCommunity discussionsTS4 Sim articles | Post

I've seen quite a handful of TS4 Sim articles being created, such as Katrina Caliente. While I'm not trying to tell that we shouldn't create anything about TS4 Sims, we should hold off creating TS4 Sim articles until the game is released as we don't really know much about them (besides sharing last name, for example), such as their traits and their relations.

Still, there are officially confirmed Sims such as Bella and Mortimer Goth and then there's also a whole slew of promotional TS4 Sims, such as Babs O'Amour and Ollie Perdue available in the gallery if you have the Create a Sim demo. What do you think on this matter? EpicJoyBoy (My talk page!) 08:15, July 20, 2014 (UTC)

EDIT: SimGuruGraham said there will be a blog article coming up about families in The Sims 4. We could add Sim articles after that, though I'm still lenient on adding it only after TS4 is released. EpicJoyBoy (My talk page!) 11:34, July 20, 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

I assume that any Sims shown in-game in the demos are likely to be in the game at launch, but I agree with your point. Perhaps it would be best to hold off on creating articles for these Sims, if for no other reason than that they haven't really been "confirmed" to be in the game. If they're Sims that don't seem to have any relation to existing Sims or any previous appearances in the series, they could just as easily be "example" Sims added to populate the world only to be removed before launch, or Sims brought in from the Gallery who aren't actually "canon". So, I agree with your proposal. - LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 08:33, July 20, 2014 (UTC)

Per above. -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 08:36, July 20, 2014 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree, considering {{{Sim4}}} is still disallowed for article use and is still in the testing phase. Ѧüя◎ґ (talk) 01:27, July 31, 2014 (UTC)