The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/Benali family and Lobo family: Difference between revisions

From The Sims Wiki, a collaborative database for The Sims series
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>LostInRiverview
(Created page with "{{PfD header|1=Benali family and Lobo family}} <!--- Add the page(s) nominated for deletion behind the "1=" in the template above. For example: {{PfD he...")
 
imported>SimDestroyer
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{PfD header|1=[[Benali family]] and [[Lobo family]]|2=I have decided to boldly '''redirect''' these pages instead of deleting them, as such things have been done in the past like k6ka said. Having them as redirects could also be kind of helpful for readers. - [[User:SimDestroyer|SimDestroyer]] ([[User talk:SimDestroyer|talk]]) 20:07, February 14, 2019 (UTC)}}
{{PfD header|1=[[Benali family]] and [[Lobo family]]}}
<!--- Add the page(s) nominated for deletion behind the "1=" in the template above. For example: {{PfD header|1=Bella Goth}}--->
<!--- Add the page(s) nominated for deletion behind the "1=" in the template above. For example: {{PfD header|1=Bella Goth}}--->
<!--- Give a brief explanation of why this article is being nominated for deletion. Be sure to sign the post using four tildes ( ~~~~ ) -->
<!--- Give a brief explanation of why this article is being nominated for deletion. Be sure to sign the post using four tildes ( ~~~~ ) -->
Line 14: Line 14:


:::I agree with the anonymus poster before me and support deletion. [[User:Gvaudoin|Gvaudoin]] ([[User talk:Gvaudoin|talk]]) 14:59, March 12, 2018 (UTC)
:::I agree with the anonymus poster before me and support deletion. [[User:Gvaudoin|Gvaudoin]] ([[User talk:Gvaudoin|talk]]) 14:59, March 12, 2018 (UTC)

::::During the TS3 era, Sims that lived alone (such as [[Hunter Cottoneye]]) were not granted family articles. This also extends to TS2 Sims who live alone, such as [[Erik Swain]]. There is precedent to deleting the articles here. To keep consistency, I '''support''' deletion. [[User:Auror Andrachome|Ѧüя◎ґ]] ([[User talk:Auror Andrachome|talk]]) 15:35, February 5, 2019 (UTC)

:::::@[[User:Auror Andrachome|Auror Andrachome]]: In which case, a '''redirect''' to [[Salim Benali]] and [[Diego Lobo]], respectively, would be a better option since that's what we've done in the past, at least with some families. Things like [[Ashton family]] (redirects to [[Devin Ashton]]), [[Custard family]] (redirects to [[Caroline Custard]]) and [[Trill household]] (redirects to [[Aria Trill]]) are examples of what we've done to TS3 single-Sim households. —[[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁</span> ([[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF">Talk</span>]] · [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F">Contributions</span>]]) 18:24, February 5, 2019 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 20:07, 14 February 2019

← Pages for Deletion | ← Past deletion discussions

Pages for Deletion → Benali family and Lobo family
This is an archive of a resolved deletion discussion. Please do not edit the contents of this page.

Page(s) for deletion: Benali family and Lobo family

Outcome of discussion: I have decided to boldly redirect these pages instead of deleting them, as such things have been done in the past like k6ka said. Having them as redirects could also be kind of helpful for readers. - SimDestroyer (talk) 20:07, February 14, 2019 (UTC)

Discussion[edit source]

These pages have been tagged for deletion with the rationale: "Single living Sims with no relatives don't need a family page."

Which brings up the question: Should single-Sim families have their own family page?

FWIW there's no harm in having the family page, as it provides a place to place the family bio (In previous games; not too sure about The Sims 4). Also, if the family gets expanded in the future, the family page already exists and doesn't need to be recreated. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:03, May 27, 2017 (UTC)

Im opposing deletion of the pages since we dont know the future of those families because there still a chance that ea will expand those families in future. I also think single-Sim families can have their own family page with the same reason too. Wiryawan310 (talk) 01:07, May 28, 2017 (UTC)
The reason why I tagged these pages for deletion is, that the family page and the sim page share the same information. Of course it can be changed, but still the family pages in my opinion shouldn't really exist. These two Sims don't have any relatives at all, and they are very unlikely to be expanded or featured in The Sims 5, unless they become very popular, like Don Lothario. There is single-living Sims in The Sims 3 that don't have family pages, and were never seemed to be even thought of having (Correct me if I'm wrong) and Johnny Zest does not have a family page, so why should these two Sims either? And the family bio has seemed to be put under the picture of the Sim (At least with Johnny Zest) because The Sims 4 does not have individual Sim bios. 85.29.96.107 (talk) 08:28, May 28, 2017 (UTC)
I agree with the anonymus poster before me and support deletion. Gvaudoin (talk) 14:59, March 12, 2018 (UTC)
During the TS3 era, Sims that lived alone (such as Hunter Cottoneye) were not granted family articles. This also extends to TS2 Sims who live alone, such as Erik Swain. There is precedent to deleting the articles here. To keep consistency, I support deletion. Ѧüя◎ґ (talk) 15:35, February 5, 2019 (UTC)
@Auror Andrachome: In which case, a redirect to Salim Benali and Diego Lobo, respectively, would be a better option since that's what we've done in the past, at least with some families. Things like Ashton family (redirects to Devin Ashton), Custard family (redirects to Caroline Custard) and Trill household (redirects to Aria Trill) are examples of what we've done to TS3 single-Sim households. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 18:24, February 5, 2019 (UTC)