User talk:Colette Rousseau: Difference between revisions
imported>C.Syde65 No edit summary |
imported>C.Syde65 No edit summary |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
==RE: Discussion about Bots== |
==RE: Discussion about Bots== |
||
I don't see any reason why not. ― '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 05:59, May 8, 2016 (UTC) |
I don't see any reason why not. ― '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 05:59, May 8, 2016 (UTC) |
||
==RE: Useless information?== |
|||
What you're saying is true. Adding unknown to the parents parameter, and adding none to siblings, spouses, and children is unnecessary. I think that stuff dates back to before it was decided that adding unknown and none to parameters was unnecessary. So yes, that information should be removed. ― '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 21:57, July 23, 2016 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:57, 23 July 2016
|
Re: Family trees program[edit source]
Family Echo is a good one to use. My Fanon pages don't use this site because their family tree is too complex to display without some fancy coding. I have developed the use of the {{familytree}} template to work for my Fanon pages. But unless you really have the understanding and patience, I would suggest using Family Echo rather than the template. -- Icemandeaf (talk) 01:14, June 14, 2015 (UTC)
RE: Discussion about Bots[edit source]
I don't see any reason why not. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 05:59, May 8, 2016 (UTC)
RE: Useless information?[edit source]
What you're saying is true. Adding unknown to the parents parameter, and adding none to siblings, spouses, and children is unnecessary. I think that stuff dates back to before it was decided that adding unknown and none to parameters was unnecessary. So yes, that information should be removed. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 21:57, July 23, 2016 (UTC)