User talk:Lulu42546
|
A few of your edits[edit source]
It may not have been your intention, but you undid an edit which you claimed to be vandalism when in-fact it wasn't.
Also there are several who believe this to be one of your accounts. Just so you know, sockpuppetry (in other words using multiple accounts) is not considered acceptable on this wiki. If that account is also yours, then I'd advise you to just stick to one account. Thank you. C.Syde (talk | contribs) 05:32, May 24, 2014 (UTC)
What C.Syde said is correct. While having multiple accounts in itself is not an violation of wiki policy , it should be noted that such accounts should be acknowledged as such, and you stick to a main account for the most part. If bootyfacezforev is indeed yours as well, the alternate account fits none of the criteria for legitimate alternate account as far as I know, unless you've actually used one account as an alternate to protect the main one. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 05:55, May 24, 2014 (UTC)
RE: Deleted fanon[edit source]
On the subject of your old revision of Fanon:Queen Elsa of Arendelle, it was deleted because it lacked any content at all. This wiki discourages any attempt of creating placeholder fanon, which is to create a fanon with barely any content, just so that it "exists", but with no sign of attempt to improve it. You are, of course, free to recreate it, but please be wary that you shouldn't leave it empty at all.
I saw that you've recreated it again under a different name, but this practice is still considered a placeholder fanon. Anyone can make fanons with just infobox in it, and you can make tens of it in a day. However, without any real content that describes your fanon, there's basically nothing to read. Nikel Talk – Vote! 06:35, May 25, 2014 (UTC)