Forum:Changing The Sims 3 Store parameter on Template:Era: Difference between revisions
imported>K6ka No edit summary |
imported>LostInRiverview No edit summary |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Forumheader|Community discussions}} |
{{Forumheader|Community discussions|archive}} |
||
<!--Add your intro here--> |
<!--Add your intro here--> |
||
This thread is to divert your attention to [[Template_talk:Era#The_Sims_3_Store]], where more editor input is needed. |
This thread is to divert your attention to [[Template_talk:Era#The_Sims_3_Store]], where more editor input is needed. |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
==In progress== |
==In progress== |
||
The template has been updated right now to support both parameters, so existing pages with <code>|STORE</code> will still function correctly. [[User:K6kaBOT|K6kaBOT]] is currently on the case, replacing "STORE" with "TS3SE". --'''[[:User:K6ka|k6ka]]''' ([[:User talk:K6ka|talk]] | [[:Special:Contributions/K6ka|contribs]]) 21:33, September 20, 2014 (UTC) |
The template has been updated right now to support both parameters, so existing pages with <code>|STORE</code> will still function correctly. [[User:K6kaBOT|K6kaBOT]] is currently on the case, replacing "STORE" with "TS3SE". --'''[[:User:K6ka|k6ka]]''' ([[:User talk:K6ka|talk]] | [[:Special:Contributions/K6ka|contribs]]) 21:33, September 20, 2014 (UTC) |
||
==Bot task done== |
|||
The bot has gone through the 4000+ pages that use {{t|Era}} and has changed all the parameters from "STORE" to "TS3SE". Should we keep the "STORE" parameter or throw it out completely? I am personally leaning towards the latter, since there's no use for the conflicting "STORE" parameter now. --'''[[:User:K6ka|k6ka]]''' ([[:User talk:K6ka|talk]] | [[:Special:Contributions/K6ka|contribs]]) 01:53, September 24, 2014 (UTC) |
|||
==Conclusion== |
|||
Thread is dead. Users should proceed boldly to wrap up the business conducted here, or else start a new discussion in the forum or on the Development Portal talk page. -- '''[[User:LostInRiverview|<font color="navy">LostInRiverview</font>]]<sup> [[User_talk:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">talk</font>]] ~ [[User_blog:LostInRiverview|<font color="green">blog</font>]]</sup>''' 01:01, October 12, 2014 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:01, 12 October 2014
This thread is to divert your attention to Template_talk:Era#The_Sims_3_Store, where more editor input is needed.
Basically, the idea here is that the current parameter on {{Era}} for The Sims 3 Store is "STORE
". This parameter conflicts with The Sims 2 Store, and if The Sims 4 has a store (which it most likely will), then it would conflict with that too.
Here's my suggestion - we change The Sims 3 Store template to "TS3STORE", similar to what we did with The Sims 2 Store (TS2STORE), and any future games will use that same format, like "TS4STORE" or "TS5STORE".
This means that a bot will be needed to change "STORE" to "TS3STORE". My idea is to make the "TS3STORE" parameter, but the "STORE" parameter will still work until a bot changes all of the parameters. Once "STORE" is fully retired, we can remove it from {{Era}}.
--k6ka (talk | contribs) 13:59, September 12, 2014 (UTC)
Discussion[edit source]
I support the change to TS3STORE. Ѧüя◎ґ (talk) 19:42, September 13, 2014 (UTC)
I support this. Although if this approved, I guess we had to change the Era name from page to page... ~~.ThePeculiarMe | (talk to me) | (my mistakes) 04:18, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Nah, a bot would be useful in this situation. -- LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 04:27, September 14, 2014 (UTC)
In progress[edit source]
The template has been updated right now to support both parameters, so existing pages with |STORE
will still function correctly. K6kaBOT is currently on the case, replacing "STORE" with "TS3SE". --k6ka (talk | contribs) 21:33, September 20, 2014 (UTC)
Bot task done[edit source]
The bot has gone through the 4000+ pages that use {{Era}} and has changed all the parameters from "STORE" to "TS3SE". Should we keep the "STORE" parameter or throw it out completely? I am personally leaning towards the latter, since there's no use for the conflicting "STORE" parameter now. --k6ka (talk | contribs) 01:53, September 24, 2014 (UTC)
Conclusion[edit source]
Thread is dead. Users should proceed boldly to wrap up the business conducted here, or else start a new discussion in the forum or on the Development Portal talk page. -- LostInRiverview talk ~ blog 01:01, October 12, 2014 (UTC)