imported>Woganhemlock |
imported>Lost Labyrinth |
| Line 211: |
Line 211: |
|
====Neutral==== |
|
====Neutral==== |
|
====Oppose==== |
|
====Oppose==== |
|
|
|} |
|
|
|
|
|
== [[User:Woganhemlock|Woganhemlock]] == |
|
|
{{userlinks|Woganhemlock}} |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Conclusion === |
|
|
Consensus was reached in support of [[User:Woganhemlock|Woganhemlock]] becoming a bureaucrat and rights were given. --'''[[user:Bleeh|<font color="navy">Bleeh</font>]]'''<sup>[[User talk: Bleeh|<font color="#489094">(talk)</font>]]</sup> <sup>[[User blog:Bleeh|<font color="#489094">(blog)</font>]]</sup> 22:10, October 3, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="margin-left:5px; float:left; width:650px; font-size:100%; border:1px solid #007FFF; background-color: #FFFFFF;" |
|
|
! colspan="2" style="text-align:center;" |Click here to expand the nomination |
|
|
|- |
|
|
| |
|
|
=== Nomination === |
|
|
I, [[User:GEORGIEGIBBONS|GeorgieGibbons]], nominate [[User:Woganhemlock|Woganhemlock]] for bureaucratship on {{SITENAME}}. What with the release of ''[[The Sims 3: Pets]]'' around the corner, I think that we could do with another bureaucrat. WH has done a lot to improve the wiki, whether it be from adding images to articles to vandalism clean-up and even improving the CSS/JS, not to mention that he never participates in any drama. Not only that, WH is a bureaucrat at [http://thesimsmedieval.wikia.com/wiki/User%3AWoganhemlock The Sims Medieval Wiki] and does a good job at it. With all those things in mind, I feel that he is a very strong choice to become a bureaucrat on TSW. {{GGsig}} 17:09, September 25, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:Thank you for consideration Georgie. I '''accept'''. {{WHsig|00:02, September 26, 2011 (UTC)}} |
|
|
=== Questions === |
|
|
*Just one question before the vote. Is it really necessary to have another crat? We currently have 4 active crats, while Bleeh and GG are the most active atm. Don't we still have enough power and helping hand for ''The Sims 3: Pets'' articles, don't you think? [[User:Nikel23|'''<span style="color:#007FFF; text-shadow: #ACE5EE 0 4px 4px;">Nikel</span>''']] [[User talk:Nikel23|<span style="color: #30D5C8 ; text-shadow: #00FFEF 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Talk''</sub></span>]] 09:30, September 27, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
:I can understand your point. However, as a couple of bureaucrats (one being myself) discussed on IRC about becoming a litte less active due to RL, we decided to open up the nominations for one more crat. A few admins were on IRC at the time as well and there wasn't any opposition. Besides, it wouldn't hurt too much to have another bureaucrat and I think WH is a good choice. {{GGsig}} 16:49, September 27, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
::Sure, it all makes sense. I trust Wogan, and I wish the bureaucrats can now serve the wiki even better without risking their own RL. [[User:Nikel23|'''<span style="color:#007FFF; text-shadow: #ACE5EE 0 4px 4px;">Nikel</span>''']] [[User talk:Nikel23|<span style="color: #30D5C8 ; text-shadow: #00FFEF 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Talk''</sub></span>]] 08:48, September 28, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
=== Voting === |
|
|
==== Support ==== |
|
|
#WH has made many improvement on this wiki. --[[User:Wir.wiryawan|Wir.wiryawan]] 02:06, September 26, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
#I agreed Wir, Wh had helped me so much.[[User:LolitaG|LolitaG]] 11:28, September 26, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
#Definitely, for all he has done for this wiki. --[[User:RoseGui|<span style="color:orange">RoseGui</span>]][[File:Thanks rose.png]] <small>([[User talk:RoseGui|<span style="color:orange">talk here</span>]])</small> 17:49, September 26, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
#Agree with above. Woganhemlock has a great anti-vandalism record and a good amount of edits. [[User:Vss2eip|<font face="Vladimir Script" size="3"><span style="color:#50C878; text-shadow:black 0 4px 4px;">'''Vss2eip'''</span></font>]][[User_talk:Vss2eip|<span style="color:#50C878; text-shadow:black 0 4px 4px;"><sup>''talk here''</sup></span>]] 17:52, September 26, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
#Per all the above mentioned reasons. --[[User:BobNewbie|<span style="color:red; text-shadow: green 0 4px 4px;">'''Bob'''</span>]] [[User talk:BobNewbie|<span style="color: lightblue ; text-shadow: 0 4px 4px;"><sup>๑</sup></span>]] 18:40, September 26, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
#There is no need to explain how Wogan has contributed himself to this wiki. He deserves the bureaucracy privilege and responsibilities. I questioned this request, but not on the purpose to doubt his work. [[User:Nikel23|'''<span style="color:#007FFF; text-shadow: #ACE5EE 0 4px 4px;">Nikel</span>''']] [[User talk:Nikel23|<span style="color: #30D5C8 ; text-shadow: #00FFEF 0 4px 4px;"><sub>''Talk''</sub></span>]] 08:44, September 28, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
#I agree with all of the above and I think he will be a good bureaucrat. [[User:DanPin|<span style="color: #74BBFB; font-family:Microsoft Sans Serif; text-shadow: #74BBFB 0 1px 1px;">DanPin</span>]] ([[User talk:DanPin|<span style="color:#74BBFB; font-family:Microsoft Sans Serif">Talk</span>]]) 06:19, September 29, 2011 (UTC) |
|
|
==== Neutral ==== |
|
|
==== Oppose ==== |
|
|} |
|
|} |
Archived page
This page is an
archive. Please
do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the
current talk page.
This page shows former Requests for Bureaucratship on The Sims Wiki.
Duskey (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
Conclusion
Consensus was reached in support of Duskey becoming a bureaucrat and rights were given. --a_morris (talk) 20:55, September 21, 2010 (UTC)
| Click here to expand the nomination
|
Nomination
I, Eduardog3000, nominate Duskey for bureaucratship on The Sims Wiki.--Eduardog3000 00:31, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
- I accept. --Duskeytalk 01:04, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
Questions
Voting
Support
- I'm surprised he isn't a bureaucrat. Also we need more active bureaucrats.--Eduardog3000 00:31, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
- I support Duskey for bureaucrat because he made a lot of good no excellent edits.-- Danny (Monster2821) (talk)(random page) @[1] 01:40, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
- I think all the things he's done for the wiki in the months that he's been here more than make him qualified to serve as a bureaucrat. I think he is level-headed, extremely experienced and is willing to put the time in to do the job right. He has my full support. -- Patrick (LostInRiverview) (talk)(blog)(random page) 02:05, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
- I agree with his nomination, he is active almost all days, he is very patience with our questions , he made a very good job as an admin. He knows a lot of things about the game and an important detail: He is very nice. I also support you fully. You will do a great job as an bureaucrat. Guilherme Guerreiro 10:52, September 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Strong support. Very helpful, very good faith editor, will do a great job as a bureaucrat. GEORGIEGIBBONS (talk) 18:15, September 16, 2010 (UTC)
- You have helped me with some good advice, and I am supporting you for becoming a bureaucrat. I think you would do a magnificent job as one, besides your always helpful to the community.
- You make more edits than there are Facebook user :), and you make great changes, so I am sure you always revert vandalism when you can. Overall you would make an excellent bureaucrat, I support you fully (as stated above), and you can always count on me for supporting you for whatever. -DarthCookie (talk)-Giovanna 06:54, September 17, 2010 (UTC)
Neutral
Oppose
|
Dharden (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
Conclusion
Consensus was reached in support of Dharden becoming a bureaucrat and rights were given. --a_morris (talk) 23:17, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
| Click here to expand the nomination
|
Nomination
I, Monster2821, nominate Dharden for bureaucratship on The Sims Wiki.
- I accept. Dharden (talk) 05:12, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
Questions
Voting
Support
- Dharden has had such a positive impact on the Wiki and has served brilliantly as an administrator. It is quite obvious that Dharden is among the most reasonable and responsible people here, and I can think of few users who are more deserving of this position. I wholeheartedly support this nomination. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog 05:37, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Support because Dharden has done many good edits, and reverted much vandalism. I think he would do as much great as a Bureaucrat, as he does as an Admin. So full support Dharden, besides we need more active Bureaucrats.--♥DarthCookie♥ 05:51, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
- He's got experience and most importantly: wisdom. --Duskeytalk 06:05, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Same reason as above, he will do a great job (thanks for correcting me and warning me when I need to :)! ---Guilherme Guerreiro 17:11, September 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Support. He is helpful. has made many good edits and already does a good job as a sysop. I am sure he will do great as a 'crat. GEORGIEGIBBONS talk contributions 16:04, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
- support He has done a good job as an admin so he will do a good job as a 'crat.--Monster2821 (talk) 16:10, September 26, 2010 (UTC)
Neutral
Oppose
|
LostInRiverview (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
Conclusion
Consensus was reached in support of LostInRiverview becoming a bureaucrat and rights were given. Dharden (talk) 17:15, February 26, 2011 (UTC)
| Click here to expand the nomination
|
Nomination
I, Dharden, nominate LostInRiverview for bureaucratship on The Sims Wiki.
- Thank you for consideration. I will accept the nomination. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog 16:47, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
Questions
Has he accepted? |_Andronikos Leventis Talk 14:50, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes I have. Feel free to ask any questions to me here. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog 16:47, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
Voting
Support
- Yes, he has done so much for this community he definitely deserves it. --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 14:46, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
- There's no doubt, he totally deserves it. --WG_94 Talk - Blog 14:49, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Complete support. I think he is ready for it. |_Andronikos Leventis Talk 14:53, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Support. He has done a lot for the wiki and he deserves the rights. GG (t) • (c) • (b) 15:31, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
- --Eduardog3000 19:12, February 12, 2011 (UTC)
- --CookieMonster888 talk 00:24, February 13, 2011 (UTC)
- --[Ѧüя◎ґ] 23:06, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
- —Random Ranaun (Talk to me!) 23:22, February 15, 2011 (UTC)
Neutral
Oppose
|
Random Ranaun (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
Conclusion
Consensus was reached to give Random Ranaun Bureaucrat rights, and rights were given. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog 15:10, June 8, 2011 (UTC)
| Click here to expand the nomination
|
Nomination
I, BobNewbie, nominate Random Ranaun for bureaucrat rights. He has shown repeatedly on his time on the Wiki, community-wise, technical-wise and administration-wise that he is capable of handling the position. His contributions to the Wiki is nothing less then excellent, and I believe that The Sims Wiki will be positively effected by him becoming a bureaucrat. --Zombie talk • blog 19:33, May 17, 2011 (UTC)
- I accept the nomination. Thank you Bob. —Random Ranaun (Talk to me!) 04:49, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
Questions
Voting
Voting is closed.
Support
- Strong Support - RR has done so much for the wiki and he deserves the rights! Lost Labyrinth
 • (c) • (b) 07:03, May 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Full Support - The knowledge he has added to this wiki is absolutely stunning, he has had a very good behavior and never messes up with people. It would be a good move to have him as a bureaucrat! Good luck with the nomination! --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 16:18, May 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Support - You have done so much for and to this wiki that you definately deserve bureaucrat rights. After all, this wiki owes you since you are such a good editor and the 97% of the family tree images have been uploaded and created by you. You deserve this promotion 100%!\_Andronikos Leventis Talk 18:41, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Support - I've been thinking about my vote a bit more, and I've came to this conclusion. Yes, we all can be a bit crazy sometimes. But, as I see it, I overreacted. That's no reason to oppose a user who has helped out on the wiki for years, and who is one of the best editors here. With this in mind, I have changed to support. Good luck. --WH (Talk) 08:30, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Support- Jones143! 01:20, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Support- I had a quick look at what he's done. Seems bureau-worthy to me. 115.132.19.17 01:06, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
Neutral
- Neutral --Bleeh(talk) (blog) 01:32, June 3, 2011 (UTC)
Oppose
|
GEORGIEGIBBONS (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
Conclusion
Consensus was reached to give GEORGIEGIBBONS Bureaucrat rights, and rights were given. —Random Ranaun (Talk to me!) 22:43, July 20, 2011 (UTC)
| Click here to expand the nomination
|
Nomination
I, Guilherme Guerreiro, nominate GeorgieGibbons for bureaucratship on The Sims Wiki. I think he deserves the priveleges for all the improvements made to the wiki, and to his particular efficiency when it comes to solving vandalism issues. --Guilherme Guerreiro (talk here) 16:18, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for the thought Guilherme and I may as well give it a shot. I accept the nomination. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 16:20, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
Questions
Voting
Support
- Note
- Struck-out votes are eliminated because they do not meet the minimum voting requirements.
- GG is very dedicated and hard-working. I think he is worthy of this position. DanPin .:::. Talk 16:32, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Georgie has shown that he's a great administrator and would be an even better bureaucrat by all his anti-vandalism work. --Bleeh(talk) (blog) 18:50, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- ~>ฬђ (tคlк ★ ς๏ภtгเ๒ร) 06:32, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
- GG always takes care the users who tried to do vandalism, mostly as I know. Nikel (Talk to me!) 14:25, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
 Jones143Talk One question: Why not? Pierogi 23:13, July 9, 2011 (UTC)- Fair, hard working, experienced, highly active, etc, are only a few reasons as to why I believe GEORGIE can, and should, become a bureaucrat. --BobNewbie ∞(Talk)∞ 19:10, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
- i vote for you Wir.wiryawan 07:54, July 14, 2011 (UTC)
Knows what he's doing and is very active. I see no reasons to not make GG a bureaucrat, but I see many reasons to make GG a bureaucrat. --Callofduty4 17:49, July 16, 2011 (UTC)- GEORGIEGIBBONS is one of the best editors in The Sims Wiki and he is dedicated to it. Keep on with the great work, you deserve this. Vss2eip 21:14, July 16, 2011 (UTC)
Neutral
Oppose
|
Bleeh (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
Conclusion
Consensus was reached in support of Bleeh becoming a bureaucrat and rights were given. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 14:03, September 18, 2011 (UTC)
| Click here to expand the nomination
|
Nomination
I realize requests are closed, but I hope that you'll make an exception for a retiring bureaucrat and allow me to make this nomination.
Bleeh has been a very long-term member of this community, and has served as community director as well as chronic IRC chatter. Aside from this, she has served as a stellar administrator (both before and after her long-term absence) and an all-around wonderful, if not a bit colorful and Big Brother-obsessed, person. I can think of no current administrator more deserving of this position, and I think that it's about time that she gets it. Therefore, I would like to nominate Bleeh for the position of Bureaucrat for The Sims Wiki. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog 05:12, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you, I'm flattered. :) I will accept the nomination. --Bleeh(talk) (blog) 15:26, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
Voting
Note: Struck out votes have been eliminated because they do not meet the voting requirements.
Support
- I think Bleeh has made so much for this community, her work has been stunning. She has been a responsible and kind admin, not to mention how popular she is on the wikia. ;) Good luck with the nomination! --RoseGui (talk here) 15:31, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
- The characteristics Bleeh has shown on her time here prove that she can handle this task. Go Bleeh! :) --BobNewbie ๑ (Talk)๑ 15:33, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
- She has a good number of edits on the wiki and a strong anti-vandalism history. I wish her best of luck! El cobayatalk here 15:39, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Bleeh can help us more as bureaucrat :) --Wir.wiryawan 16:36, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
Per nom nom nom nom. Pierogi 17:41, September 4, 2011 (UTC)Per nominaton. --N7 [T|C] 17:49, September 4, 2011 (UTC)- Bleeh has proven on her long time on the wiki that she could be able to handle this position, and I have complete confidence she'll do a terrific job. Good luck! ―ฬђ talk 05:14, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Bleeh will make a wonderful bureaucrat. Her knowledge is amazing and she is worthy of this title. DanPin (Talk) 18:31, September 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Bleeh is with no doubt one of the most active and devoted editors here. She will do an amazing job! She has my full support. Andronikos Leventis Talk 19:32, September 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Bleeh makes an important role in this wiki. And she gains trusts to lead this wiki, along with some others crats. She is tremendous! Nikel Talk 14:31, September 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Bleeh has done very good work on this wiki. No doubt that she will do a good job as a Bureaucrat. She has my full support.--♥DarthCookie♥ 20:50, September 12, 2011 (UTC)
Neutral
Oppose
|
Woganhemlock (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
Conclusion
Consensus was reached in support of Woganhemlock becoming a bureaucrat and rights were given. --Bleeh(talk) (blog) 22:10, October 3, 2011 (UTC)
| Click here to expand the nomination
|
Nomination
I, GeorgieGibbons, nominate Woganhemlock for bureaucratship on The Sims Wiki. What with the release of The Sims 3: Pets around the corner, I think that we could do with another bureaucrat. WH has done a lot to improve the wiki, whether it be from adding images to articles to vandalism clean-up and even improving the CSS/JS, not to mention that he never participates in any drama. Not only that, WH is a bureaucrat at The Sims Medieval Wiki and does a good job at it. With all those things in mind, I feel that he is a very strong choice to become a bureaucrat on TSW. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 17:09, September 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you for consideration Georgie. I accept. ―ฬђ talk 00:02, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
Questions
- Just one question before the vote. Is it really necessary to have another crat? We currently have 4 active crats, while Bleeh and GG are the most active atm. Don't we still have enough power and helping hand for The Sims 3: Pets articles, don't you think? Nikel Talk 09:30, September 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I can understand your point. However, as a couple of bureaucrats (one being myself) discussed on IRC about becoming a litte less active due to RL, we decided to open up the nominations for one more crat. A few admins were on IRC at the time as well and there wasn't any opposition. Besides, it wouldn't hurt too much to have another bureaucrat and I think WH is a good choice. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 16:49, September 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Sure, it all makes sense. I trust Wogan, and I wish the bureaucrats can now serve the wiki even better without risking their own RL. Nikel Talk 08:48, September 28, 2011 (UTC)
Voting
Support
- WH has made many improvement on this wiki. --Wir.wiryawan 02:06, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
- I agreed Wir, Wh had helped me so much.LolitaG 11:28, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Definitely, for all he has done for this wiki. --RoseGui (talk here) 17:49, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Agree with above. Woganhemlock has a great anti-vandalism record and a good amount of edits. Vss2eiptalk here 17:52, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Per all the above mentioned reasons. --Bob ๑ 18:40, September 26, 2011 (UTC)
- There is no need to explain how Wogan has contributed himself to this wiki. He deserves the bureaucracy privilege and responsibilities. I questioned this request, but not on the purpose to doubt his work. Nikel Talk 08:44, September 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with all of the above and I think he will be a good bureaucrat. DanPin (Talk) 06:19, September 29, 2011 (UTC)
Neutral
Oppose
|
.svg){kind=small}
• (c) • (b) 14:03, September 18, 2011 (UTC)