From The Sims Wiki, a collaborative database for The Sims series
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by imported>RossInSA at 18:28, 3 May 2013(→Community Consensus). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
All new administrator applications must include a selection of two administrative projects that the applicant would like to fill upon promotion. Check the administrative projects page for a list of projects and the duties associated with them.
Administrator requests are almost always open on The Sims Wiki.
Minimum requirements
If you have proven yourself to be a valuable member of the community, and you think you're capable of doing the job, this is where to apply. Minimum requirements are:
Average or higher wiki editing knowledge.
This means you have to have contributed regularly to some wiki (not necessarily this one).
Having started to contribute on The Sims Wiki (edits in the content namespace are not taken too seriously).
Your first edit on The Sims Wiki should not be your application on this page.
Understandable, (almost 100%) correct English all the time.
If u talk liek dis, ur not rdy 2 bcome admin
Playing the game is nice, since you'll be editing and making decisions based on the game's content.
Be able to expand articles to make them more useful for the community.
You should not copy articles from Wikipedia and paste them here.
Rollback rights are a prerequisite for requesting adminship.
Stage 1: Nominating
Users may nominate themselves or be nominated by another user for administratorship. The nominee then has to accept the nomination before voting can begin.
If the nominee accepts the nomination, they should also choose two Administrative projects when stating their acceptance.
Multiple requests at one time are allowed.
Administrator candidates that are not given administrator privileges are ineligible to be nominated or to nominate themselves for at least a month.
Stage 2: Voting
Users may support, be neutral toward, or oppose the nomination. Users must provide a reason behind their position.
Users must have 50 edits and be a regular contributor for a month to be able to vote or nominate. Users who have been absent for extended periods of time (3 months or more) will be considered as "new users" for the purposes of RfA and must make 50 edits and be contributor for a further month before voting.
Everyone's vote counts as one vote. Admins do not hold extra power.
A bureaucrat will then determine whether consensus has been reached. This means that administrator requests require at least a two-thirds support rate to pass. Strength of argument is more important than the number of votes.
Admins and bureaucrats may nominate and/or vote on a nomination. However, a bureaucrat who votes on a nomination and later reviews the nomination must review according to the vote result, not their personal opinion of the nominee.
A vote on an RfA shall last for 1 week.
Votes on an RfA may be closed early if it is obvious that consensus against it will not be reached. (e.g. 6+ support and 0 oppose)
What you will do as an admin
Revert vandalism, warn and/or block vandals.
Move pages to correct page names, delete unnecessary redirects.
Have a strong voice when decisions have to be made.
Represent The Sims Wiki well in the Wikia and internet community.
What you may not do as an admin
Use your administrator privileges to take advantage of users or to control the wiki.
Ignore the needs and wants of wiki users.
Act as a poor representative of The Sims Wiki on other wikis, or participate in major cross-wiki drama.
More info and a list of current admins can be found at Administrators.
Positions available
Additionally, some special positions are available for administrators and members of the community. These are filled on the Requests for special positions page, though users requesting administratorship here may in their request ask for one or more of these positions. List of positions and their responsibilities is available on this page. Willingness to take on special duties may make you more likely to be selected.
Hello, my name is HanaGoth96 and I would like to nominate myself for sysop rights. I feel that I would be a good admin editor of this wiki as I am a helpful user, helping those who ask me for assistance. I also like to guide users the correct way, pointing out how to license images correctly and the correct templates to use when creating new fanon. I am also a rollbacker, having undid several acts of vandalism on various articles and I have also helped out with a few incidents involving vandals. English is my first language and I am familiar with the British-American spelling policy.
I joined this wiki in February 2013 and have already made more than 1700 edits, most of them consisting in mainspace articles. I am friendly to my fellow users and have partake frequently in community discussions. My knowledge on the wiki has grown vastly since joining and I feel ready to apply for the sysop rights. I don't know if the admin projects are still running or are being used at all, but as it is a prerequisite then I would like to work on the two projects Image & File Maintenance and Layout & Navigation. I would also like to say that I will not use my sysop rights to cause harm to the wiki and will apply these rights fairly and only when necessarily.
I would like to take the opportunity to thank you for considering my nomination and if the consensus goes my way, I will do my best to carry out the role to the best of my abilities. HanaGoth96 (Neigh...?) 18:01, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
Community Consensus
This period of consensus will last for one week. Time remaining: 18:07 May 9, 2013 UTC.
Question - I'm curious - you were nominated for admin less than a week ago, but you chose to turn it down; why? -- LostInRiverviewtalk ~ blog 18:08, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
Answer - I felt that Fangirl's nomination was not descriptive enough and it had some issues with the wording. I appreciated her nomination though. HanaGoth96 (Neigh...?) 18:11, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
There are two main questions that need to be answered when selecting new administrators. Firstly, is the applicant/nominee capable of using sysop rights effectively, to improve the wiki on a more technical level, to help grow the community, and to help combat vandalism? But beyond the question of whether a user can handle, technically-speaking, the powers that adminship provides, there is an additional question; can the user be trusted to apply those powers fairly, to apply them without prejudice, and to be open to criticism from users and other administrators if those powers are allegedly misused?
I am sure that HanaGoth meets the first of the two criteria I have listed. I am confident that if she were given administrator rights, she would be more than capable of using those tools that would be at her disposal; her edits so far on the wiki do prove this. But those very same edits and actions on the wiki also cause me some concern when it comes to the matter of answering the second of the two questions posed here. Unfortunately, Hana has shown a propensity towards rash action rather than well-thought reaction to criticisms, disagreements or quarrels.
I am not a fan of personal criticisms of applicants. I have been voted against on similar grounds in the past. For this reason, I do not oppose this application; I am simply hesitant. It would be improper for me to support the application given the issues I have seen, but it would be improper for me not to give her a chance to prove that she is ready for the position. -- LostInRiverviewtalk ~ blog 18:37, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
I understand that I do tend to take criticism a little too hard and that I do tend to get into disagreements and quarrels with other users, but I can also keep myself calm and I would really like the chance to prove to you that I do have what it takes to be an admin. HanaGoth96 (Neigh) 18:57, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
I guess for the sake of clarity and fairness to you, I'm going to come out and formally oppose this nomination. Actions speak louder than words, and there's no real way to prove that you've changed except through demonstration, which would be difficult to do in an RfA. It's not fair to you to expect you to try and demonstrate that to gain my support (although my support is only one vote). And, with all due respect, the time you have to prove that you're ready to be an administrator is before you apply to be one. My only advice is to take those faults you acknowledge and try to improve them, and apply later. - LostInRiverviewtalk ~ blog 04:18, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
Strong Support - I think that HanaGoth deserves to have admin rights. Being an active user for just 3 and a half months, she has a very impressive edit count consisting of many main content edits, along with a strong history of reverting vandalism. I assure you that Hana only has the best intentions. Cavia (wheek • speak) 19:32, May 2, 2013 (UTC)
Neutral - I don't doubt that Hana has admin potential; the skill and good intentions are clearly there. However, given the points that have been raised, I'm not sure she is ready for it yet, though I am still open on that matter. Dharden (talk) 12:44, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
Support - Hana is a great editor. Recently she may have been inappropriate but her behaviour has improved immensly. I really do think she is cut out for becoming an admin, she plans out everything. Heck, she's even been planning this request for weeks. Hana really deserves this, I'm sure she'd make a great job of it, but just a bit of advice for Hana, sometimes you just need to keep your calm. http://images2.wikia.nocookie.net/woganhemlockstest/images/c/c4/300.gifColinThePandameow15:57, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
Oppose - I'm not convinced at this time that you possess the mindset of an administrator and I'm worried, based on your tendency to overreact, that you'll make poor decisions with the admin tools. As LiR said, addressing these flaws should really be done before posting an RfA and I will safely say that you do have potential and everything else is sound, so don't be too disheartened by this. LostLabyrinth • (c) • (b) 17:56, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
Weak Oppose - Per Lab. DanPin • talk • contribs 18:23, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
Support - I think Hana deserves rights. She has an good edit count and reverts vandalism wherever she can. RossInSA (talk) 18:28, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
Mathetesalexandrou (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log) has been a long-time contributor and by far our most prolific Fanon author. His qualities go far beyond his ability to tell a good story, though. Though he is not an administrator, he has tried to improve the Fanon namespace for other contributors; one example of this is his pursuit of Fanon Battles. He has even served as an inspiration for other budding authors, and this in turn bolsters the Fanon namespace even more.
Ultimately, Mathetesalexandrou is a competetent experienced editor and a good community role model, and I think he would make a good addition to the administrative team. Therefore, I'd like to nomiate Mathetesalexandrou for administratorship on The Sims Wiki. -- LiRspeak ~ read 06:03, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
And I would happily accept, although there is a small issue regarding the project element. Although the Fanon administration is the obvious choice, I am rather unclear on the second project to administer. Henceforth I shall be open to accepting, although I shall need some sort of recommendation or work-around for the second needed project. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 06:05, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
Consensus
This will last for up to one week. Countdown: 06:10:00 December 5, 2012 UTC
- Support (obviously), for the reasons stated above. -- LiRspeak ~ read 06:11, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Support - I've always believed that he's eligible to become one. He sure knows the wikia workarounds here, even though he mostly spends his time in Fanon namespace. NikelTalk–Vote! 11:24, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Support - Dharden (talk) 12:01, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
Support - I've often seen Math weighing in with his views and vision on the fanon namespace. Given the work he's produced and his watchful eye on the demise of Featured Fanon Content, I think he'll benefit from the sysop tools. LostLabyrinth • (c) • (b) 17:45, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Support - Star-Talk 20:51, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
Oh look voting dried up here. Consensus is obviously positive, and admin rights will be granted. ―ฬђtalk08:45, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I would like to become an admin because I been on the Wiki for a few years already and I'm going to start to edit grammar and i been called "Friendly" and "Nice" And i always hated vandalism.
Thank you and Happy Simming!
--Fanboy123 02:27, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
Application Declined - you do not meet the necessary prerequisites in order to apply. Please be sure to meet all minimum requirements before applying again. -- LostInRiverviewtalk ~ blog 02:40, February 3, 2013 (UTC)
I'd like to nominate Waikikamukow (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log) for adminship. From taking a quick look at her contributions, you can see that she knows what she is doing, whether it comes to adding new information, cleaning things up or even patrolling other's edits to the mainspace. In addition to this, she also has a strong countervandalism history, seems to know the difference between the "Undo" and "Rollback" tools, and is, obviously, highly active. Compound onto this she is in a timezone where administrative activity is fairly low (compared to the UTC-0 users) and she regularly gets involved with the community. With what I have mentioned in mind, I am confident that Waikikamukow would be a great user to have on the administration team and hopefully she'll accept my nomination. :) LostLabyrinth • (c) • (b) 23:11, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
Okay, so when I saw this, I have to admit I was pretty shocked. I took some time to think about it and I read a few of the pages about being an admin, and I would like to accept Lab's nomination (thank you very much, Lab :D). However, should the consensus go my way, I may have to speak to one or a couple of admins about using some of the new tools and "admin projects". Anywho, thank you to Lab and WH (for nominating me for rollback rights) and everyone else that has helped me so far and I'm ecstatic that I was even nominated. :) ~ Waikikamukow (Anyone wanna chat?) 20:07, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
Consensus
This will last for up to one week. Countdown: 20:07:00 March 19, 2013 UTC
Support - As nominator. LostLabyrinth • (c) • (b) 20:24, March 12, 2013 (UTC)
With a record of 10 supports in a few hours there is absolutely no reason to leave this open any longer. I'm approving this nomination, congrats & good luck! ―ฬђtalk05:20, March 13, 2013 (UTC)
As my last duties on the wiki (before i retire) i want to nominate HanaGoth for admins right, she had made a lot of anti-vandalism edits, she added a lot of era templates, (i find that very helpful) and a lot more. Before i leave this wiki this has been in my head for days. --Fangirl4545 02:17, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
This nomination awaits a response from the nominee before any action can be taken. -- LostInRiverviewtalk ~ blog 02:26, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
Fangirl, I honestly cannot thank you enough for your nomination but I was planning on waiting a while longer to nominate myself. So, I'm going to decline this nomination for now, but I do really appreciate the thought Fangirl. :) HanaGoth96 (Neigh...) 07:17, April 29, 2013 (UTC)
Open to requests.
• (c) • (b) 17:56, May 3, 2013 (UTC)
.svg){kind=small}
• (c) • (b) 23:11, March 10, 2013 (UTC)
