The Sims Wiki:Requests for bureaucratship/K6ka (February 2015): Difference between revisions

From The Sims Wiki, a collaborative database for The Sims series
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Content added Content deleted
imported>C.Syde65
imported>Woganhemlock
Line 17: Line 17:


::'''Support:''' K6ka is certainly qualified for this promotion and he has most certainly earned it. He is definitely expert at how the wikis work. There's literally nothing else I can say, since everyone else seems to have said it for me. -- '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] &#124; [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 23:45, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
::'''Support:''' K6ka is certainly qualified for this promotion and he has most certainly earned it. He is definitely expert at how the wikis work. There's literally nothing else I can say, since everyone else seems to have said it for me. -- '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] &#124; [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 23:45, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
:::'''Support:''' K6ka is a combination of highly dedicated to this wiki, being well versed on the workings of wikis in general and in addition is experienced with wiki administration, both here and elsewhere. In addition, the somewhat dwindling activity of the other bureaucrats means that I feel like we could probably do with another one as well. If you put that together with what has already been said I see no downside to this nomination and I can only see the wiki being better off as a result. Best of luck with your nomination! {{WHsig|00:42, February 1, 2015 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 00:42, 1 February 2015

The RfB for K6ka

Nomination

k6ka (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)

The user JustinLovesWikia12345 has requested that k6ka be nominated for Bureaucrat. The user believes that k6ka would make a fine bureaucrat due to the dedication that he has for the wiki. This belief is also shared in part on my side as well: he has indeed made frequent edits in the wiki, and is one of the most active members of the wiki, frequently taking part in communications, handling users, etc. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 20:18, January 31, 2015 (UTC)

Note: the user that requested this nomination has been blocked from editing The Sims Wiki. Therefore, I am inclined to say that this nomination is null-and-void. However, Mathetesalexandrou has indicated support for the nomination as well. So, as a result, I will be closing this nomination unless Mathetesalexandrou wishes to "adopt" it. If he would like to do so, then we can proceed along as usual, and K6ka can either accept or decline the nomination being made by Mathetesalexandrou. -- LostInRiverview talkblogcontribs 22:27, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
Adoption seems like a good thing. I proceed to take the nomination over. MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 22:36, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
This nomination has been adopted by a user in good standing and is valid. It now awaits a response from the nominee. -- LostInRiverview talkblogcontribs 22:41, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
Well... I suppose if a response is necessary, I would like to humbly accept this nomination. Thank you Mathetesalexandrou for nominating me! --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 22:44, January 31, 2015 (UTC)

Discussion

Please include your comments below. This discussion shall last at least five days. Time remaining until the minimum deadline has elapsed: .

Given my choice to adopt the nomination and the rationales given above, I don't really need to further explain my position, do I? MILK FOR THE UNYUUFEX, FLAT CHEST FOR THE CUTENESS THRONE, SKULLS FOR THE SKULL PROBES (user talk:Mathetesalexandrou) 23:10, January 31, 2015 (UTC)

Support: There's literally no way I can possibly include all of K6ka's positive traits in one comment. He is an expert at how wikis work and a stellar administrator. He is very active in community discussions, projects and other endeavors. He is kind, friendly, approachable, helpful, and assumes good faith in users. K6ka is completely qualified for this promotion and he has earned it. -- LostInRiverview talkblogcontribs 23:41, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
Support: K6ka is certainly qualified for this promotion and he has most certainly earned it. He is definitely expert at how the wikis work. There's literally nothing else I can say, since everyone else seems to have said it for me. -- C.Syde (talk | contribs) 23:45, January 31, 2015 (UTC)
Support: K6ka is a combination of highly dedicated to this wiki, being well versed on the workings of wikis in general and in addition is experienced with wiki administration, both here and elsewhere. In addition, the somewhat dwindling activity of the other bureaucrats means that I feel like we could probably do with another one as well. If you put that together with what has already been said I see no downside to this nomination and I can only see the wiki being better off as a result. Best of luck with your nomination! ђ talk 00:42, February 1, 2015 (UTC)