User talk:Jawusa: Difference between revisions
imported>C.Syde65 |
imported>K6ka No edit summary |
||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
:::I am aware that this discussion is as good as dried up, but I remember two years ago when I was an anon. People often undid my edits without fully considering whether I might be correct. ― '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 22:50, January 2, 2016 (UTC) |
:::I am aware that this discussion is as good as dried up, but I remember two years ago when I was an anon. People often undid my edits without fully considering whether I might be correct. ― '''[[User:C.Syde65|<font color="maroon">C.Syde</font>]]''' ([[User talk:C.Syde65|<font color="black">talk</font>]] | [[:Special:Contributions/C.Syde65|<font color="black">contribs</font>]]) 22:50, January 2, 2016 (UTC) |
||
==Re Housekeepers== |
|||
Hi. In general, when determining whether or not an NPC is safe to play as, they need to have 1. Full playable character data, 2. A real name, and 3. Are regenerated when moved in. However, as much as I can say about this, please direct your comments to [[Game guide talk:Which NPCs are safe to play as?]] so this can be discussed in the proper venue. Also keep in mind that editors that revert your edits have nothing personal against you, so keep this in mind, stay calm and civil, and refrain from repeatedly reverting back (also known as edit warring). —[[User:K6ka|'''<span style="color:#0040FF">k6ka</span>''']] <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁</span> ([[User talk:K6ka|<span style="color:#0080FF">Talk</span>]] · [[Special:Contributions/K6ka|<span style="color:#0B4C5F">Contributions</span>]]) 14:38, September 11, 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:38, 11 September 2016
|
About your edit on LFT society
I agree with your edit of the LFT Society. I have made a place on the talk page to discuss the dispute about the correct list of members. I realize that is might seem presumptuous when another editor (who happens to be an admin) undoes your edit. My guess is that editor had recently added the list for all of the societies and didn't realize that the list was copied for the wrong society, so he assumed that your edit must have been wrong. Regardless of the reason, I hope that this doesn't cause you to not help out with the wiki because of this one mistake by one user. -- Icemandeaf (talk) 21:56, January 2, 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I didn't realise that the list was copied for the wrong society. I must have somehow forgotten to add the correct members, when I was adding lists for all three societies. So naturally I didn't realise that I'd added the incorrect information. That can sometimes happen. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 22:16, January 2, 2016 (UTC)
- It's OK guys. I was over-reacting a bit with this. I'd love to help the Sims Wiki more. It's a great site. Please don't take my words personally.
- I didn't mean it in that way. I really love this website!
- You can find all the helpful information about the game in one place. That's why I like this site so much. Thank you for being a terrific site!
- Best wishes
- Jawusa (talk) 22:25, January 2, 2016 (UTC)
Re Housekeepers
Hi. In general, when determining whether or not an NPC is safe to play as, they need to have 1. Full playable character data, 2. A real name, and 3. Are regenerated when moved in. However, as much as I can say about this, please direct your comments to Game guide talk:Which NPCs are safe to play as? so this can be discussed in the proper venue. Also keep in mind that editors that revert your edits have nothing personal against you, so keep this in mind, stay calm and civil, and refrain from repeatedly reverting back (also known as edit warring). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:38, September 11, 2016 (UTC)