The Sims Wiki:Requests for IRC Channel operator
| User Rights | Rollback (Requests) |
Moderator (Requests) |
Administrator (Requests) |
Bureaucrat (Requests) |
IRC Channel Operators (Requests) |
Shortcut |
 |
|
| IRC Channel operator |  Open to requests.
|
|---|
IRC Channel operator requests are almost always open on The Sims Wiki.
Minimum requirements
If you feel that you are a valuable member of the IRC channel and you think you would benefit from channel operator flags, this is where to apply. The minimum requirements are:
- An account on irc.freenode.net
- Fair knowledge of operating an IRC channel.
- Being highly active in the channel
- Applying for this should not be the first thing you do after joining IRC for the first time.
- Understandable, (almost 100%) correct English all the time.
- If u talk liek dis, ur not rdy 2 bcome chanop.
- A record of civil behavior
- If you're constantly being told not to mess around then you're not ready for this.
- Prerequisites — before you can become an Op, you must already be a HalfOp. Before you can become a SuperOp, you must already be an Op.
Please be sure you read The Sims Wiki:IRC Channel Operators in order to understand the different tiers of channel operators on The Sims Wiki before applying.
Application procedure
Stage 1: Nominating
- Users may nominate themselves or other users for IRC operator rights.
- Multiple requests at one time are allowed.
- Operator candidates that are not given any additional privileges are ineligible to be nominated or to nominate themselves for at least a month.
Stage 2: Discussion
- A period of discussion shall last at least five days.
- If a request will clearly not achieve a favorable consensus (i.e. there is absolutely no support for promotion) - in other words, the request doesn't have a "snowball's chance" of passage - it may be closed early.
- After five days of discussion, it shall be determined whether a consensus is in favor of a user being given operator rights. If there is a consensus, rights will be awarded. If there is clearly no consensus for a user to be promoted, the discussion is ended and rights will not be awarded.
- In cases where consensus is not clear after five days, discussion will continue for three additional days.
- If, after this time, there is no clear consensus for promotion, the nomination will end and the nominee will not be promoted. This will occur even if a consensus against promotion does not exist.
Note
Administrators, bureaucrats, and other channel operators may moderate discussions and votes and determine consensus, but only SuperOps may award rights to successful nominees. Administrators, bureaucrats, and channel operators may participate in discussions and vote, but must be impartial when moderating, determining consensus, and awarding rights.
Guidelines for discussion and consensus
- All registered users may participate in a nomination for IRC channel operator; however, more weight will be given to arguments made by users who frequent the IRC channel.
- Points of discussion should be focused on assessing the ability of a nominee to perform their duties. Discussion should avoid sweeping praise or generalizations (e.g. "he/she is a good editor" or "he/she deserves it"), and focus instead on specific reasons why a user is or is not a good fit for the position.
- Users engaged in discussion may contradict the points raised by another user, but should remain respectful at all times. Back-and-forth arguments between two users should be avoided.
- Generally, consensus in a request can be determined by answering these questions:
- Are there major and specific problems raised by multiple users regarding the nominee?
- Is there a lack of agreement between users over whether a nominee is qualified, capable of serving or a good fit for the role?
- If the answer to these questions is 'no', there likely exists a consensus for the nomination.
Open requests
HalfOp
Auror Andrachome
Auror Andrachome (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
I wanna nominate Auror Andrachome for HalfOp! She is helpful and very friendly! She always protects Sims Wiki against trolls and she can do the same on the IRC! Black Boi Benji (talk) 22:46, July 8, 2016 (UTC)
Lost Labyrinth
Lost Labyrinth (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
I wanna nominate Lost Labyrinth for HalfOp! He is very friendly! He owns Mystique and Deus Ex Machina and they protect the IRC from the trolls and provide fun and he can protect the IRC from trolls too! Black Boi Benji (talk) 22:46, July 8, 2016 (UTC)
Op
SuperOp
Closed requests
HalfOp
User:Black Boi Benji
Black_Boi_Benji (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
I wanna apply for HalfOp! I am always helpful when I am on IRC and I am very popular! I know how to use the bots and I can make the IRC a great place for all! I know a lot about chatrooms and I can protect the members of this one from trolls. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Black Boi Benji (talk • contribs) 22:28, July 6, 2016 (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~
Strongly Opposed You are constantly being told not to mess around as a the result of the spam and constantly being removed by protection bots, so you don't have a record of civil behavior in the channel. I can't support your request at this moment in time. Ben (talk) 23:00, July 6, 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose - Since I'm not a frequent visitor of IRC, I couldn't even participate in this discussion without waiting for someone else to voice their opinions, but given what MrC has said about you, I cannot support your request and I'm seconding what MrC has said as a result. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 23:10, July 6, 2016 (UTC)
Speedily closed per the snowball clause (Let's also not forget you're currently banned from the channel right now). —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:28, July 7, 2016 (UTC)
Op
Ben/MrC/MrBenC
MrBenC (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
So, guess I'll start this off. The differences are small, since if this request is successful, I'd just gain the ability to change the topic. Back when I used to run the channel statistics web page, this would have been useful if I had to move it from one server to another, so a different URL. However, this is for a different reason. Since the new rules have been implemented, it has been proposed as part of the reform process that some users have their flags removed, due to limited IRC knowledge. One of these users occupy the SuperOp (formerly Bureaucrat) tier, while another who formerly had that tier has resigned from that role. While time will tell, if this entire proposal goes through, it would mean the only people with SuperOp abilities will be the contact, and one user who hasn't been very active lately.
Under the new rules, this is a prerequisite to SuperOp and no provision exists to leap-frog or skip tiers. In the event those users listed in the proposal are dropped, I want to be in a position to apply for SuperOp later on.
Hopefully, my record, knowledge, experience, and reputation speak for themselves. Ben (talk) 01:43, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
Support Knowing Ben from other IRC networks, he is clearly competent with using IRC and definitely a trusted channel member. This system is still fairly new so there are definitely kinks that will be worked out over time, but I have no doubt that Ben's expertise will benefit the channel. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 01:47, June 18, 2016 (UTC)
Well there is clear support for the promotion, so Done Flags added. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 19:40, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
SuperOp
Ben/MrC/MrBenC
MrBenC (talk · contribs · editcount · block · modify rights · logs · block log)
So, I was recently promoted to Op not even two weeks ago. Ordinarily I wouldn't attempt to move up yet again this quickly. However, the circumstances justify this. As of this writing, there are only two SuperOps, one who is marked inactive and the other marked as semi-active. The potential candidate list is very short, and any other potential candidates would have to go through the Op nomination process first.
Not sure if there's really much more that needs to be said, that I didn't say in my original Op nomination request. Ben (talk) 04:29, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
- Strong Support - Although I'm not that active on IRC, from what I've seen and/or heard, you definitely seem to know and understand what you're doing. And given that we've recently had an IRC channel reform, we definitely could do with a couple more operators. You've been a half operator since 2013, but you've only been an operator for less than two weeks. But like you've said, we currently only have two SuperOps, and I don't see why being an operator for less than two weeks should have any negative effects on your nomination. So I'm all for supporting it. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 05:34, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
- Support Like I've said in your nomination for Op, you're an IRC operator on numerous networks and you definitely have more than just channel experience. This is a no-brainer. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 11:49, July 3, 2016 (UTC)
As consensus is clearly favourable, this request is now Done —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 15:40, July 9, 2016 (UTC)