Category talk:Candidates for deletion/Archive 12

Archived page

This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Archive Pages for Category talk:Candidates for deletion:
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · 13 · 14 · 15

LOLSims

This article is basically a tiny bit of information about a community created TS2 meme factory with literally every related image being hosted and displayed here anyway. Personally I don't think it's relevant enough to warrant its own article and it can easily be found from the TS2 website anyway. I'd say if we're going to mention it at all then it's better suited in it's own section on and/or a link to the webpage from TheSims2.com. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 13:31, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

I agree. DanPin • talk • contribs 14:02, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

For the record, pretty much every image on that page which is from TheSims2.com qualifies for deletion if we decide to delete this page. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 20:49, May 20, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, it's pretty much worthless imo. ―ฬђ ^talk 07:57, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, mention it, link it, but it doesn't rate a page. Dharden (talk) 10:49, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

I've mentioned and linked the subject on TheSims2.com. The page and its (what would have been) orphaned images have been deleted. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 16:20, May 21, 2012 (UTC)

Johnathan Lefre

I can't really say much about this, since I don't have WA. The article itself somehow sounds like it's just a Sim that's mentioned in some promos. Just look at the picture. Nikel _{Talk – Vote for Featured Media!} 08:28, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Seems real imo, but that said I'm not intending to walk around a neighborhood for an hour to see him. If someone could check the game strings or something for him that would be great. ―ฬђ ^talk 08:30, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

Somehow, I wish Inge would make another teleporter cat for TS3 again. Nikel _{Talk – Vote for Featured Media!} 08:33, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

For now, I'm just going to give this Sim the benefit of the doubt and assume he's real. I've removed the image and rewrote the article to sound a bit more formal. If anyone has seen this Sim in game, please provide a headshot if possible. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 18:41, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

I'll have to use the master controller to see if he is real, I will report back. Xxgreenbunnyxx (talk) 19:00, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

I'm just going to go ahead and delete the page because he does not exist. Xxgreenbunnyxx checked and I've looked everywhere twice in that neighborhood and dungeons, so this Sim is just made up for promos. (ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻)ǝıuooɯɹɐʇsVOTE! 17:26, July 25, 2012 (UTC)

I have a better suggestion, which is to move him to list of Sims used in promotional materials instead, which suits him more. Nikel _{Talk – Vote – Guess!} 11:17, July 27, 2012 (UTC)

Businesses (The Sims FreePlay)

In its current state, this article pretty much warrants deletion. I would have just deleted it straight away but given that in the case someone here has played the game and has knowledge about the involved businesses, they may want to work on the article. Otherwise we may as well delete it and someone who actually knows something about it can start over. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 23:24, June 2, 2012 (UTC)

It's pretty doubtful if there's anyone to have the knowledge of this article and editing at once. I agree to delete it. Nikel _{Talk – Vote for Featured Media!} 10:06, June 3, 2012 (UTC)

I totally agree with everything the two people above my comment said. Delete it. Bakerychaz 08:37, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Dont delete it ive got sim freeplay buisneese i must amit pretty rubbish the artical but there not much pge of freeplay

The layout is problematic and there really isn't much content, meaning one may as well just start over. Deleted. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 10:23, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Rebecca Goth

There has only been one editor who contributes this page, who is an anon. The other edits don't really add any changes to the content, but rather only to fix the layout, which makes me suspect that she is not even real. Someone really has to prove her existence before anything related to the Goths and her is made, and eventually more theories emerge. Nikel _Talk 12:15, June 14, 2012 (UTC)

I don't have this game so I can't really say anything but if anyone does then please do some research, and maybe try to get an image, so that we have some proof that this Sim does merit some reference. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 10:21, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

I own this game and Rebecca Goth is on the opposite side of the road from my family with her cat Buttons Goth. This page should not be deleted. i will try to find a picture of her on my game.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.204.255.155 (talk • contribs) 16:18, June 18, 2012 (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~

Several people has confirmed that she exists. It needs to be expanded now. Nikel _{Talk – Vote for Featured Media!} 03:14, June 19, 2012 (UTC)

A Few of my Images

I Put these for deletion as I feel that these pictures are no longer needed due to the fact the Brandon Merrick and Betty Merrick Articles have been deleted Xxgreenbunnyxx 09:20, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Done. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 10:18, June 17, 2012 (UTC)

Midlife crisis

It shouldn't be deleted! So many people are looking for information on how to trigger a midlife crisis, this article provides solid information, and shows the point system.

Actually if you look on List of Moodlets, the moodlet for the midlife crisis is there and tells you how it is triggered and some other information. Starmoonie(Talk Here) 02:24, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

No, don't delete it. It's actually useful. The List of Moodlets says nothing about how it's triggered unless I missed something. It only gives the in-game description and the mood boosts and such.

Did you look under the "From" section? It clearly states you get it from Young Adult to Adult transition but who knows, it may still be there. Starmoonie(Talk Here) 03:07, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Still, the list of moodlets is pretty long, and the Midlife Crisis moodlet is far down in it. I think the article can be useful, but it really needs to be cleaned up. Dharden (talk) 03:59, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Don't delete it, just give it a cleanup. Bakerychaz (talk page) 05:10, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

Now I suppose it needs to be expanded instead of cleanup. The layout looks okay to me now. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 09:54, July 4, 2012 (UTC)

I don't think it should be deleted. It's an important event when it happens. I just think it should be cleaned up and expanded. :) Waikikamukow _(Talk) 08:30, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

It's already cleaned up but needs some more info, so it's off the hook. Starmoonie(ノಠ益ಠ)ノ彡┻━┻) 08:33, July 5, 2012 (UTC)

Amanda Houseberge

Reading this Sim article, it sounded like she's downloaded or what. I don't get it. Are players able to share their family in console Pets? And all her glitches make no sense at all. Is she even real? Nikel _{Talk – Vote – Guess!} 13:19, July 14, 2012 (UTC)

Forum:"The Sims 3: Seasons" Expansion Ideas and Forum:"The Sims 3: Glamour Life Stuff" Pack Ideas

Alright, these pages are both about suggested expansion or stuff packs (i.e. not confirmed or legitimately rumored) and both simply say that the EP/SP should have the same exact content as a previous game. I see no purpose in keeping these threads if no new ideas are being presented. -- LiR ^{speak ~ read} 00:02, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

They both have very little merit whatsoever. They're gone. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 11:30, July 22, 2012 (UTC)

RelatedVideos:Rainelle Neengia

Judging from the history, my guess is that, when changes are made to the "Related Videos" module for a page, "RelatedVideos:(PAGE)" is used to track them. Therefore, I've removed the delete tag. Dharden (talk) 16:54, July 23, 2012 (UTC)

I've removed the deletion template from RelatedVideos:Eleanor Goldbeard upon seeing this. Honestly, it looks really messed up. Nikel _{Talk – Vote – Guess!} 05:48, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, it looks weird unless you think of it as something that doesn't really need to be human-readable, and wasn't really meant to be. Dharden (talk) 06:06, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Hack Conflict Detection Utility

The whole article is basically a couple of lines about a tool which doesn't really seem significant enough to warrant its own full article. If it warrants any sort of reference then I think it should just be mentioned on SimWardrobe where the tool is hosted, so I think we should delete this page or possibly redirect it to SimWardrobe. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 18:34, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed and if we do want to put it on Sim wardrobe I'll put a picture Xxgreenbunnyxx (talk) 18:37, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Works for me. Dharden (talk) 18:42, July 24, 2012 (UTC)

Redirected to SimWardrobe. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 20:11, July 25, 2012 (UTC)

The Sims support status

The Sims support status is merely a list of The Sims series but with release date and a not-so fancy table. There's no need to keep it, it looks oblivious, and incomplete. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 08:24, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

Not even sure why we have this Xxgreenbunnyxx (talk) 15:31, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

That's exactly why I'm bringing up this case. :/ Why wouldn't anyone else bother showing their opinion? Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 19:56, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

Not sure either but It will more than likely be deleted Xxgreenbunnyxx (talk) 20:00, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah it can go. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 20:14, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

And gone it is. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 19:17, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

Template:News-upcoming

This template is obsolete. We don't use it, and we no longer need it. We already have Game Release Countdown in the main page as well. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 08:34, August 2, 2012 (UTC)

It's as obsolete as obsolete gets, therefore I've gone ahead and deleted it. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 20:17, August 9, 2012 (UTC)

Jeremy Edwards

I never heard nor read about that Sim even in SimPE. Does he really exists? JM9193 (talk) 19:24, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

I can't determine any legitimacy from the content of that article, so unless someone can verify his existence, I'm all for deleting. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 19:28, August 19, 2012 (UTC)

It was created by some random guy who only edited once (or three if you count his userpage). I myself am not familiar with the name, and I assume it was just some kind of random fanon Sim. Deleted. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 06:50, August 20, 2012 (UTC)

Sims from The Sims Bustin' Out

On the Todo Page I am Fairly Sure I've done everything The Sims Wiki:Todo/Bustin' Out Sims So It should be able to go now. Xxgreenbunnyxx (talk) 14:22, August 21, 2012 (UTC)

I don't really understand why the issue was brought up the first place. Is it about to separate the Sims from console and handheld versions? Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 03:59, August 22, 2012 (UTC)

Anyway, I'd like to thank you for your work too. :) I've separated the category by game and deleted it. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 06:30, August 22, 2012 (UTC)

List of Sims

The article List of Sims seems to me totally redundant, as we already have Category:Sims that automatically catalogs Sims in the game. Additionally there are the following issues which I believe warrant deletion:

• Page length/size - the page is very very long and size-wise is huge, at over 130,000 bytes, making it easily one of the largest pages on the wiki. For technical reasons, pages much beyond 50,000 bytes are not preferred (at least, on Wikipedia) so we're well beyond that guideline
• Manual Updating - Unlike a category, Sims need to be added to this list for each new game. Since we already have a hard time getting the Sim pages created for newer expansions, isn't having another page for cataloging a bit excessive?
• Out of Date - From what I can tell, only Sims from Sunset Valley and Riverview (for TS3) are included on this list, meaning that it would be necessary to add hundreds of new Sims to bring it up-to-date. This of course would involve a lot of work and would make the page even longer/larger.

The only saving grace I see for list pages is that they are easier to navigate for people unfamiliar with categories. But listing every Sim from every game on one article seems to me to be very excessive, so even if we chose to keep the other list pages (e.g. List of Sims from The Sims 2, List of Sims from The Sims (console)) this master list seems largely unnecessary. -- LiR ^{speak ~ read} 00:52, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed. Dharden (talk) 01:46, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Delete it. ―ฬђ ^talk 01:57, August 23, 2012 (UTC)

Agreed since December 2011. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 14:48, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

Deleted. Dharden (talk) 15:01, August 24, 2012 (UTC)

Types of death

This list isn't very essential after all. The entire list has been included in death, and needlessly to say ghost too. While there's no real issue to delete it, I don't suppose there's a real purpose why we keep it as well. Due to this, I hesitate to do any action. :/ Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 12:55, September 11, 2012 (UTC)

I support this deletion.

TWikia _Talkie

14:13, September 11, 2012 (UTC)

I'm in favor of keeping it. The information may be available elsewhere, but if someone just wants a quick at-a-glance overview, the list has the advantage of being compact. Dharden (talk) 14:23, September 11, 2012 (UTC)

I think it will be better if the page will be a template, linking the deaths into the template.

TWikia _Talkie

09:29, September 12, 2012 (UTC)

I kinda agree with Dharden. I suppose it would still be good to keep it. :/ I guess I'm slight in favor to keep it. As for the template, I don't have anything to say for now. Although I don't suppose the navigation could be eye-catching, like {{TalentBadges}}. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 14:50, September 12, 2012 (UTC)

List of car owners

I don't think there's anyone who wants to check who owns what vehicle in every single household, not to mention if they have to re-check it whether they "premadely" possess the vehicles at the first place, or somehow spawned. We can get rid of it straight, or just wait until anyone wants to update it. Personally, I go with option number one. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 16:02, September 25, 2012 (UTC)

I don't think too many people would care who owns what car, not to mention that it's tedious to update and its pretty listy. So I'm all for the deletion. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 19:32, October 16, 2012 (UTC)

I agree. Too hard to hanlde and barely even glanced at. I support its deletion. Freedomtalk 19:54, October 16, 2012 (UTC)

Deleted. - LiR ^{speak ~ read} 21:27, October 16, 2012 (UTC)

Ah, I guess I was a bit too bold when I first nominated it for deletion. Actually I tried to give the reason that cars were something special back then, but it's now been a common thing people don't pay as much attention anymore. Both reasons lead to deletion anyway. :/ Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 12:34, October 18, 2012 (UTC)

I liked that page, waaa. 🌹Deathbee1000 08:17, December 17, 2012 (UTC)

User Blog:Devdevdev, My Signature code (private code for me to remember.)

It is no longer needed for me to remember it. So It should really be deleted and left deleted, anyone agree ? 🌹Deathbee1000 19:04, October 15, 2012 (UTC)

If you created it, and you want it to be deleted, that's enough. It's gone. Dharden (talk) 19:12, October 15, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! 🌹Deathbee1000 08:09, November 8, 2012 (UTC)

Rick DeBleu

Rick DeBleu should be deleted because he wasn't created as a Fanon and it is mine (I have now transported it to a Fanon.🌹Deathbee1000 08:00, November 8, 2012 (UTC)

Next time, if it's about fanon, you can personally ask an admin to help out for simplicity, or just simply append {{Delete}}. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 04:04, November 11, 2012 (UTC)

TheQuxxn

I'm nominating this article for deletion, though I'm not sure if it should be deleted. We, as far as I know, have no other articles detailing 'well known' players or YouTubers. The last article that I believe we had - about Curtis Paradis - was ultimately deleted for lack of relevance. So I think the question here is whether or not The Sims Wiki should cover well-known Sims players. And, if we say that TSW should, then the question becomes what constitutes well-known.

Ultimately I'm neutral at the present time on deletion. I'd like to hear what others have to say. -- LiR ^{speak ~ read} 04:26, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

From The Author of The Page "TheQuxxn":

I was actually planning to write about some other Youtubers as well - like AndrewArcade, Sweetnightingale, and a couple of others who people enjoy. I just think that it would be cool to create some articles about Sims community members who are now making contributions to the Sims world through youtube. These people are creating really interesting things, like interesting families, awesome buildings, cool legacy challenge ideas, etc., and I know many people have been inspired by these creations. Also I find in the comments of Youtube that often people ask a ton of questions about the Youtuber - and the youtuber can't always reply to every single question, even though some try. So I thought it could also be a neat and organized way of compiling information about these Youtubers.

As for wether or not TSW should write about these people; I think they should. Being a simmer means you're part of a sharing community; this is a feature I've found repetedley since I started playing Sims. And these people who are making videos are very interesting, and have a lot to share; I think it could contribute a lot to TSW.

It's true that it's difficult to judge who counts as "Well-known"...of course you can judge people like Quxxn and Curtis very easily because everybody talks about them, but then there are people like Sweetnightingale, who creates a lot of amazing ideas and puts them into video, but she's not mentioned all over the Sims world like Quxxn is. But I think that's a matter that needs to be tackled seperately from wether or not this article should be deleted or not.

Anyway, that is my point of view on writing about famous simmers on youtube :) (Sorry for so many re-edits; I did this on my phone)

~JellyJelemy, author of "TheQuxxn" article.

I think we could move it to another type of page like a userpage, althought TheQuxxn isn't a user yet. 🌹Deathbee1000 07:33, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

I don't think moving it out of the content userspace would work. -- LiR ^{speak ~ read} 07:49, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

Well I say it should be deleted. This person has no account, and leaving this page will just say "Hey! any other Sim players who has walkthroughs or playthroughs (or any other videos) can create pages like this!" and will leave a huge mess. Star ಠ_ಠBee 11:01, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

JellyJelemy, the purpose of The Sims Wiki's mainspace is primarily to provide information about the games, not the community. (Communities may be more proper.) Yes, we do list a handful of custom content sites, with the understanding that no list can possibly be complete. Yes, we do have articles on a few relatively well-known custom content and/or information sites, but we do not, as a rule, have articles about custom content creators, no matter how well known they are, or how interesting their creations are. I am therefore opposed to a general practice of creating articles about famous-to-some YouTube Simmers, Even if those articles adhere to our Neutral Point of View policy, a proliferation of such articles might affect the perception that we are here to inform, not promote. Dharden (talk) 14:50, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

I'd say we delete it. I mean, sure TheQuxxn is a big Sim player, there aren't pages like PewDiePie on Amnesia:The Dark Decent Wiki (it was deleted due to the lack of quality, but it could have been expanded on by other users, which it wasn't) or Huskey Starcraft on the StarCraft Wiki, But like what Bee said, it was an unregistered user who created the page. It would create the green light for other users to do the same thing. AsherÉire I'm a lonely person, so please talk to me... 16:04, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

I think Devly was referring to the fact that the page is about a person who doesn't have an account here. The page itself was written by a registered user, User:JellyJelemy. There is no rule prohibiting anyone from creating pages right now, even unregistered contributors (and putting in such a rule might not be approved by Wikia).

As for the matter at hand - the reason I'm neutral is because I do not necessarily think The Sims Wiki can't host this kind of information. At the same time, what Dharden said about the perception of The Sims Wiki - whether "we are here to inform, not promote" could very well become an issue if this article should remain. -- LiR ^{speak ~ read} 16:15, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

I don't remember where Curtis Paradis' deletion discussion was held, but I'd say to delete it, as it's rather similar to his case. I don't think we can let each Simmer who makes CCs and creates walkthrough to warrant their own pages, as it appears to be subjective. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 17:16, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

From looking around, I've noticed we don't actually have a policy which outlines what is and isn't notable. I feel that it is almost vital that this is discussed in a forum thread and maybe have a formal notability policy established.

To speak personally on this, I'd say delete it. The article is written more like its intent is to promote as well as various formatting issues and what Nikel said about subjectivity. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 17:21, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

There is this forum thread regarding notability for pages on websites; perhaps we can expand the discussion and come up with a policy out of that. I agree that this place isn't exactly the best place to do it.

As for the matter at hand - so far it seems that most favor deletion. For the sake of giving everyone an opportunity to weigh in, I'm choosing to leave this discussion open for a few days; I hope the other admins will do so as well. -- LiR ^{speak ~ read} 17:47, December 20, 2012 (UTC)

Minor comment: Any user involved with this discussion may wish to take a look and weigh in on this thread, which is all about dealing with notability and situations like this. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 12:39, December 21, 2012 (UTC)

Deleted: Because the consensus here seems to favor deleting the article, it has been deleted. If the outcome of a community discussion favors the allowance of articles like this, the page can be un-deleted. -- LiR ^{speak ~ read} 01:02, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

Golems

This article has been nominated since November 12, and appears to have been a straight lift from Golems on the TSM wiki, right down to the links linking to the TSM wiki. My inclination is to delete it, unless someone has a good reason not to. Dharden (talk) 00:20, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

Yeah I say delete and if it does warrant its own page despite the logic being contested in the nomination then write from scratch, otherwise just give it a mention. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 00:22, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

Deleted Dharden (talk) 00:45, December 26, 2012 (UTC)

Running with Scissors Playset

This article has been nominated for deletion on the grounds that the website for The Sims 2 will close soon. I oppose deletion on two grounds. First, it may be mirrorored or archived, and therefore would remain available after the official website closes. Second, even if it does become unavailable, the article should be kept for reasons of history. Dharden (talk) 16:12, January 8, 2013 (UTC)

I oppose deletion for those same reasons. However, I wonder if it would be possible to merge this page with another/others, since it is quite short on its own. If that's not possible or practical, I support keeping it as-is. -- LostInRiverview ^{talk ~ blog} 17:30, January 8, 2013 (UTC)

Someone should probably look for it. My online time will be limited until I get my PC up and running again. Dharden (talk) 22:40, January 8, 2013 (UTC)

Oppose on historical grounds. It's pretty sparse but I can't really think of anything to merge it into. If we delete this then we may as well kill The Sims 2 Store Edition as well because it would fall under the same argument </sarcasm>. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 22:53, January 8, 2013 (UTC)

The delete nonination has been removed. Dharden (talk) 23:04, January 8, 2013 (UTC)

Sims 3 University

I don't understand what this page even means... It has no info or images. Besides, another page exists - The Sims 3: University Life. Vss2eip^{talk here} 22:15, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

I changed the page to a redirect... but it might be worth it just to delete it outright. I might change my mind and just delete it completely, but in any case the page is no longer a 'content' page. -- LostInRiverview ^{talk ~ blog} 22:23, January 9, 2013 (UTC)

Time Travel

This page is created as a "said" upcoming feature for the future expansion pack. We haven't even known what EA would provide with this idea, and this page is simply created way too soon. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 06:17, January 18, 2013 (UTC)

I changed the page to a redirect. It can be changed back to an article when we get closer to release time. -- LostInRiverview ^{talk ~ blog} 06:49, January 18, 2013 (UTC)

File:2Gunther_Goth.JPG

Even if this image does need to be redone, which I question, it can be kept until it is redone. It has sufficed for years, and I see no reason to believe that it will not continue to suffice. Therefore, I oppose deletion. Dharden (talk) 12:54, January 27, 2013 (UTC)

I oppose deletion with the same reason as Dharden's. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 17:36, January 28, 2013 (UTC)

If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 15:48, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

Seeing no further input, I'm calling this resolved. This image will not be deleted. Dharden (talk) 15:46, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Donte Perry

I nominate this page for deletion. I suspect this Sim is nonexistent. It was created for a very long time and only has 5 revisions at least once per year. His existence is debatable and unclear, as he's not mentioned or linked anywhere, and it doesn't even mention where he's from. Each TS2 neighborhood already has a complete list of townies and NPCs, so if he's not from PC, where is he from? Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 15:39, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

I haven't heard of him either and I don't remember him being in TS2 PS2. Unless he's a handheld character, I'd say he's part of the generic name pooling system and that we should delete if so. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 15:47, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

From the description, he appears to be a slob from Nightlife, and they get random names. Unless that's the name that's used in the game files, the article should go. Dharden (talk) 16:34, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

The premade slobs, according to the game files, are Grayson Butler and Rebecka Garth. I guess it does describe himself as an NPC slob... Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 17:03, February 10, 2013 (UTC)

Can we conclude this and the above discussions, or we should wait any more inputs? Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 15:28, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. Dharden (talk) 15:41, February 18, 2013 (UTC)

Zuhau Beach

Not confirmed, and no fansite found information that the new world would be called by this. I think this is just a user's idea. Cavia^{wheek here} 21:25, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Also, Google search for the term got no hits. Deleted. Dharden (talk) 21:41, February 17, 2013 (UTC)

Forum:What_is_your_favorite_comedy?

It should be deleted because, it has norhing to do with the wikia and the picture is is is well once you click the link you know what i mean. This user seems to be not making any postive contributes, but thats what i think you may think diffrently. Blue12porcupine (talk) 18:50, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Kim Japalan

Never heard of this Sim, the article seems to say highly contradictory things and the Japalan is not even the name of any Sim producer as said in the article (the right one being "Jayapalan", should the Sim exist at all.) JM9193 (talk) 20:51, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

I suspect this (spelled properly) may be a randomly appearing name. Dharden (talk) 21:55, March 22, 2013 (UTC)

Reading the description, it's said that she could be a local chef or breakdancer, which can't be possible to say that she's a premade NPC. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 03:07, March 23, 2013 (UTC)

Some unused logos

While I appreciate the uploader to find these logos, I can't find the actual games that use these. The logos are the following:

• File:The Sims 3 Plus World Adventures Logo.png
• File:The Sims 3 Plus Ambitions Logo.png
• File:The Sims 3 Plus Late Night Logo.png
• File:The Sims 3 Plus Generations Logo.png

If the case is that the bundles simply don't exist, then I think there's no need to keep it. Thoughts? Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 14:47, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

I just want to add a comment: I hate that EA doesn't keep a clear list of compilations in The Sims 3. I never heard of these games before, but I suppose EA released them to earn more money... Cavia (wheek • speak) 14:52, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Actually, they started doing this since Pets until now. The thing I hate is that they needlessly bundle up an EP with base game, which is... totally useless. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 15:52, April 1, 2013 (UTC)

Disregard my statements above. It's EA, they can change anything at anytime. Now that There's Plus Late Night and Plus Generations, it's just time to wait for the rest of the EP bundles. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 13:54, May 30, 2013 (UTC)

Simlish iPhone App

So basically it's about an iPhone app that processes text into Simlish (similar to an Autotune voice processing app I guess). Given that it's unofficial and I've personally never heard of it, I'm leaning towards deletion but given it's most likely fan-created and somewhat a derivative from the series, I'd like to know what other's think before we make any decisions. Lost Labyrinth • (c) • (b) 18:14, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

Delete! It's not official and it doesn't really belong here. This isn't an advertisement site. Cavia (wheek • speak) 18:28, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

I think it should be deleted, it's clearly been copied and pasted from a Facebook status. And as Vss has stated above, this isn't an advertisement site. HanaGoth96 (Neigh...?) 18:34, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

It's apparently real; at least, the first Google hit for the phrase is to an iTunes link for it. Still, it's not official, and the article is a plug for the app, which, IMO, puts it outside the guidelines. Dharden (talk) 18:41, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

This particular subject doesn't really fall into any of the listed categories on the Notability Policy... but I think it falls closest to 'player created custom content' since it's not a game modification. Based on that interpretation, I think the article fails to meet our Notability Policy and should be deleted. -- LostInRiverview ^{talk ~ blog} 20:54, April 16, 2013 (UTC)

It seems to be fan-created app, so I'd lean to deletion. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 02:50, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

Deleted. Dharden (talk) 03:06, April 17, 2013 (UTC)

Untitled.png

I've asked ParanormalJ about this file. I think we can wait a bit for a reply before deleting it. Dharden (talk) 14:47, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

It's been there since January. I would delete it straight if I were you, but asking the uploader is fine I think. Nikel _{Talk – Vote!} 14:55, April 21, 2013 (UTC)

No response after several days, so it has been deleted. Dharden (talk) 11:15, April 26, 2013 (UTC)