Forum:New Discussion - Should we separate The Sims 4 information from the Original pages?

From The Sims Wiki, a collaborative database for The Sims series
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by imported>M2Panthera at 16:48, 17 June 2015. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index → Community discussions → New Discussion - Should we separate The Sims 4 information from the Original pages? | Post

This is my Original post found HERE

Many, many, many times The Sims DEVS have stated that The Sims 4 universe is a completely different world from The Sims 1/2/3 plus spinoffs universe. So why are the characters who appear in the original universe and the new universe still on the same page? Like Bella Goth for example? I suggest that these pages should be separated! So we would have Bella Goth or Bella Goth (Original) which would focus on her life from the original universe, then Bella Goth (The Sims 4) or Bella Goth (Alternative) that will focus on her life from the new universe and any possible sequels in the future. I mean the characters from The Sims 4 are actually completely different characters from their original counterparts so I think the pages should be separate. As The Sims 4 is a completely different universe some information conflicts with information established in the original series.

I think this Wiki should follow the path that the Tomb Raider wikia has done to show the different Lara's like this:
Lara Croft (Original Timeline)
Lara Croft (Legend Timeline)
Lara Croft (Rise Timeline)

Basically, what I'm saying is we copy the information established about The Sims 4 from character/family pages and put the information on subsequent pages about said character/family. Give the information a bit of a clean up and what not. It may be a tedious process at first but it's the simplest solution seems that nothing has been done. 

Many Wiki's have adopted this sort of thing for separate timelines now, or even different forms of characters. Examples of this are the Tomb Raider one's shown above as well as:
Nightmare (Main Page)
Nightmare (Siegfried)
Nightmare (Inferno)
Nightmare (Graf Dumas) All of that is from the Soulcalibur Wiki, it was a very recent change that didn't take very long and it was lead by me (I'm an Admin over there).Also the Sonic Wiki which has seperated the Main timeline from the Boom timeline.

If we adopt something like the examples shown this Wiki could look a bit cleaner and it would be less confusing for people as well. Obviously if the change does happen I will be happy to help make it happen and get the pages set up and what not.

So what do you think we should do? Should we separate the pages? I mean, it would make more sense as the characters from The Sims 4 are completely different characters than the ones in the original timeline.

Should Characters from The Sims 4 who also appear in the original games get a different page for their Sims 4 counterparts?
Please vote below.
0
0
There were 0 votes since the poll was created on 01:43, 12 December 2021.
poll-id 673180020440CD23A20999AC4B9816EE

—Preceding unsigned comment added by JaseyJasee (talk • contribs) 03:25, June 1, 2015‎ (UTC) - Please sign your comments with ~~~~

Discussion

This was already discussed at Forum:Organization for TS4 timeline, but the discussion died off as a consensus was silently formed. Also, per our voting policy, polls cannot be used to conduct votes, and votes should generally be used as a last resort: consensus gained through discussion should be used first. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 11:26, June 1, 2015 (UTC)

I know there was a previous discussion, and like it states if you want to bring the subject up again make a new thread, so I did. That last discussion was inconclusive more than anything else...
Sorry I didn't know that, to me I think a poll is a better way to decide things like this, I think you get a better answer rather than discussing it. People are more likely to press a button that says "yes" or "no" rather than having a big disscussion. Also, to what extent in the discussion will results be decided? I dont want the discussion to die off again, i think polls give you more precise answers than a genreal discussion... From a discussion how do we know what the final "say" will be to make changes or not? In a poll the results are right there I think you would get a better result from that, but if the rules say you need to have a disscussion then a discussion it is, I personally think the poll results should stand though? Anyway, what is your thought on this then? If its a discussion we have to have what do you think on the situation?
JaseyJasee (talk) 13:16, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
You can use polls to a general mood, but they can't be used to establish a policy or practice. The poll feature is notoriously easy to mislead, so we can't be guaranteed of its accuracy. Not to mention, discussing solutions is important, as there are often details to be worked out; it's a kind of nuance that a simple yes/no poll just isn't able to achieve. All that being said, there's nothing wrong with using a poll informally.
Onto the subject at hand, I do think that splitting those pages might be a good idea. LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 14:11, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
Oh I see now, sorry I'm just used to Wikis that use polls instead. Every wiki that I use that use polls to decide things like this has went smoothly without any problem. Like I previously stated I lead the Nightmare Page split over at the Soulcalibur Wiki, that was decided with a poll and everything went very smoothly and a big discussion wasn't needed.. After the poll was over we just changed the pages like stated in the original post. I find the voting policy over hear a bit strange and more complicated but I will follow the rules nonetheless.
Yeah, I think if we split the pages it won't be too difficult, we can start basic by just copying The Sims 4 information onto said new pages.. That is saying we do the two splits and not the five splits ie Bella Goth (Original) and Bella Goth (The Sims 4) or Bella Goth (Alternative) JaseyJasee (talk) 14:24, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
The previous response I made was somewhat limited, as I hate typing out long responses on my phone. After the blog post was made yesterday, I reached out on the TSW Facebook and Twitter feeds for reader opinions on a proposed split. The responses received said they'd rather see the information kept on the same page and split into distinct sections, rather than divided onto completely separate pages. Now of course, four people responding on Twitter and Facebook isn't a mandate of anything, as there could easily be many others choosing not to respond or who simply haven't seen the post. But admittedly this sort of a decision could have wide-ranging effects. You do raise a valid issue, in that the average reader isn't going to participate in this discussion (just as the average reader is also not a wiki editor at all). The burden in many ways falls on the actual editors to perceive how the readers would react to a change. To a certain extent I would dismiss the comments on Twitter and Facebook as simply being resistant to change or unaware of how such a change would be implemented; that sort of reaction is to be expected. But before any sort of change is made going forward, we might want to come up with some way of polling our reader base to get their general opinions on a change. This is a circumstance in which a poll might be useful - to determine the overall intent of the readership, as a piece of "evidence" towards making a decision in a discussion.
I think some change to the way it's done would be good, but I'm not sold on a page split necessarily. We could achieve the same result with less headaches by making a more clear divide within a page itself. This could be achieved by using two instances of {{simbio-start}}, for the TS1-TS3 timeline, and then for the TS4 timeline, separated by a section break. That's just one idea, however. At this point, I don't think there are many ideas off the table, including the page split being proposed. - LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 16:16, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
I was wondering if tabbers would work here. For example:
John Doe appears in The Sims, The Sims 2, The Sims 3, and The Sims 4.

Foo

Bar

Foo

Bar

--I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 17:08, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
Hmm, tabbers sounds like an okay idea. I have quickly just made a page for Bella Goth, basically showing what her The Sims 4 page would be like.... This is the vision I have about the whole situation Bella Goth (The Sims 4). Then her original page would stay the same but minus all The Sims 4 information.. What do you think?
EDIT - Also, that didn't take me very long and it's as detailed as can be provided the information from The Sims 4, and it really didn't take me very long.
JaseyJasee (talk) 17:25, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
Tabbers don't display correctly on the mobile skin. LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 17:38, June 1, 2015 (UTC)
So, does anyone have any further thoughts on this? I don't want the forum to go dead before a decision is made.
JaseyJasee (talk) 14:55, June 2, 2015 (UTC)

I disagree and do not support this motion of creating separate articles for TS4 universe counterparts of prime universe Sims and other such things. If we were to create multiple articles for every single Sim that existed in both realities, then it would make for a pretty short read. It's not like Memory Alpha where they can have different articles for the same character. MA can do this because the prime reality and alternate reality from Star Trek 2009 are completely different. TS4 isn't much to go on by ways of differences between two realities. The border isn't well-defined anyway, so there isn't much point in creating separate articles. ―The Tim Man (Infinite Histories • Galactic Crucibles • The Sims Wiki • AltHistory • Contribs) 16:35, June 2, 2015 (UTC)

So, are we going to come to any sort of decision soon? Or is more discussion needed?
JaseyJasee (talk) 20:30, June 4, 2015 (UTC)
More discussion is needed - there isn't a clear consensus yet.
@LostInRiverview: Tabbers don't work on the mobile skin, but we still use it extensively on existing articles already. Sim articles already use tabbers. Many other wikis, like the FNaF Wiki, use it to divide articles as well. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 20:55, June 4, 2015 (UTC)
It might be worth considering moving away from tabbers in other locations where they're used as well, but that's a different discussion. - LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 02:45, June 5, 2015 (UTC)
Well the Poll results are at 10 Yes and 10 No and not much discussion has been happening... Any thoughts? - JaseyJasee (talk) 00:35, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
A bit off topic, but with regards to the tabbers, <span style="display:none;"></span> tags can be used to hide text from desktop view but make it visible in mobile view. We can add the tab title in it and mobile users can see it, but desktop users can't. We can add it just under the tab title. Should throw a bone for mobile users. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 02:17, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
Like I said, though, polls can't be used to determine policy or consensus, so for now I'm discounting the poll results. I was actually tempted to just close it, since it isn't going to make a difference anyway. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 02:21, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
I know they can't be used but they can at least help towards a decision :). I was just wondering then, I know some people are against this decision... But, why in the world is Bella Goth (Lunar Lakes) separate from the original Bella Goth page? And people are fine with that? It was confirmed that Lunar Lakes Bella Goth is the EXACT same person as Bella from TS1/TS2/TS3 Sunset Valley, so why does she get a whole page for Lunar Lakes when it's the same character? Whereas TS4 Bella IS a different character but is a part of the original Bella Goth page? - JaseyJasee (talk) 02:28, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
My best guess is that it was done to avoid confusion, since it's basically the same Sim appearing in essentially the same game more than once. --I am k6ka Talk to me! See what I have done 02:35, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
Ah I see, I don't think it's confusing. You could just add a section to Bella Goth called Life Leading Up To The Sims 3: Lunar Lake or something similar. That's a whole different discussion however. - JaseyJasee (talk) 02:39, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
I think the Bella Goth/Bella Goth Lunar Lakes problem is pretty representative of the issue as a whole, in that it demonstrates that the whole process of deciding how articles are sorted and arranged is pretty much decided on a whim. To my recollection there never has been any conversation about having a separate page for Bella Goth in Lunar Lakes, it was just decided by someone and everyone else followed suit. Regarding this discussion... there doesn't seem to be a clear consensus either for the status quo, or for the split as proposed. So it might just fall upon someone to act boldly and implement a change, and then let everyone else fight it out consider other options for a time. - LostInRiverview talk • blog • contribs 03:39, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
Hmmm I see.... Well with that in mind we may as well start by changing Bella Goths page seems that I have already made a test version for her Sims 4 version here I can just change the title to make it an "official" page, and removing The Sims 4 information from her original page. Then moving on to Mortimer, Cassandra, Alexander... And possibly making a new "Goth Family (The Sims 4)" page seems that in The Sims 4 Bella and Mortimer don't have any family (i.e Bella doesn't have a brother etc) thus their family tree would be different from the original timeline. Start with that, see what the response is and if nothing is said or the response is good continue on with all The Sims 4 characters like Dina, Nina, Don etc... Agreed? - JaseyJasee (talk) 17:52, June 16, 2015 (UTC)
I disagree. Dev statements weren't usually taken into account in this wiki, and nor were inconsistencies (which was the main reason for the devs' aforementioned statement). In fact, the Sims series is strife with inconsistencies. Here are some:
There are also many inconsistencies with personality, starsign, genetics (ie: hair color of elders in The Sims 2 vs. other games). I'm not aware about how each timeline is consistent in and of itself in the Tomb Raider series, but a single inconsistency of the Caliente sisters' mother named Nighat or Katrina isn't enough of an excuse for splitting articles IMHO.M2Panthera (talk) 16:48, June 17, 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://www.thesimswiki.com/wiki/Forum:New_Discussion_-_Should_we_separate_The_Sims_4_information_from_the_Original_pages%3F?oldid=828714"