Category talk:Candidates for deletion

From The Sims Wiki, a collaborative database for The Sims series
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Info information icon.png
Deletion discussions have moved
Deletion discussions on The Sims Wiki are no longer conducted on this page. Please go to The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion to participate in and/or start deletion discussions.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15

File:Artistic (TS3).png and File:Trait Artistic small.png[edit source]

I've just been browsing some unused files, and I found "File:Artistic (TS3).png" which is an unused image. However it is a better quality version of another image "File:Trait Artistic small.png" which is far from unused.

I'm inclined to support the deletion of the "Trait Artistic small.png" file and have "Artistic (TS3)" re-named in it's place, to avoid having to manually update the file links on the pages that use "Trait Artistic small". However the "Artistic (TS3)" image is a slightly different size which may cause it to appear differently in the place of "Trait Artistic small".

For those reasons, I've decided not to take matters like this into my own hands, and in any case I wasn't going to take this matter into my own hands, because I want to know what others think about this. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 07:21, October 29, 2015 (UTC)

Replaced "File:Trait Artistic small.png" with "File:Artistic (TS3).png" and deleted the latter. It appears that "Trait Artistic small.png" is utilized mostly by templates, which also set the size of the image when using it. As a result, the size of the replacement image shouldn't matter. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 22:50, July 29, 2018 (UTC)

Template:User democrat[edit source]

A little over a year ago, we deleted a template that stated that a user was in favor of same-sex marriage. The argument that I made, and that ultimately several other people consented with, was that real-world politics should be avoided on The Sims Wiki in order to avoid the conflicts that can sometimes accompany them. I feel that this point is still valid, and as a result I would like to nominate {{User democrat}} for deletion. -- LiR talkblogcontribs 05:19, January 24, 2016 (UTC)

Reviving this discussion in hopes of reaching a consensus. Personally I am neutral on this subject, if only because I wish to avoid having to entangle myself into the spaghetti-mess that is politics, but for sure I can see the arguments for and against this. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 16:54, October 23, 2016 (UTC)
Sims wiki policy concerning real world politics doesn't have a consistent record. I'm opposing the deletion of the template. Ѧüя◎ґ (talk) 07:31, December 6, 2016 (UTC)

Discussion closed, result is to keep owing to lack of support for deletion -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 02:09, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

Template:Warning and Template:Warning-text[edit source]

I propose that we delete Template:Warning and Template:Warning-text, as they have been superseded by the new user warning templates. Since the main argument for creating the new warnings was the inadequacy of the old warning, we should fully finish the job and delete the original warning template. No user pages contain the template through transclusion so we won't be breaking anything; all references to the template are through links instead, so we could set the template up as a redirect to The Sims Wiki:Warning instead. There may be a historical argument for keeping the template, but I'd argue that any historical benefit to keeping it is outweighed by the possibility that the old warning may be used, when the new user warnings system was designed to replace it. Ultimately I think we lose very little by just deleting the old warning template (and its auxiliary text template) outright. -- LiR talk · blog · contribs 14:05, December 17, 2016 (UTC)

The old warning can be wrapped in <noinclude></noinclude> tags to prevent anything meaningful from being transcluded or substituted. We've kept our old-old warning template for historical purposes and it has never been used, likely due to the fact that it has been moved to another name. Perhaps we can do that here as well. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:41, December 17, 2016 (UTC)
FWIW we also can't delete {{Warning-text}}, because the way our old warning template was designed, this template is transcluded onto people's talk pages. Deleting it would break hundreds of transclusions. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:14, May 26, 2017 (UTC)

Discussion closed, result is to keep for historical and compatibility purposes. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 02:09, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

Straud Mansion[edit source]

Discussion moved from Talk:Straud Mansion. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 00:22, March 23, 2017 (UTC)

Im purposing deletion in this page because i think an individual lot like this doesn't warrant its own page. the information is too minim for lot to have its own page. Wiryawan310 (talk) 00:15, March 23, 2017 (UTC)

Update: the article is merged in Forgotten Hollow page like any other neighborhood. so this page is not needed anymore. Wiryawan310 (talk) 02:01, April 8, 2017 (UTC)
I support deletion. All the information can be found on the List of Forgotten Hollow lots. Gvaudoin (talk) 15:20, March 2, 2018 (UTC)
Another idea: The page could be redirected to "List_of_Forgotten_Hollow_lots#Straud_Mansion". Gvaudoin (talk) 14:56, March 12, 2018 (UTC)

The contents of the page already exist at List of Forgotten Hollow lots#Straud Mansion, so having a separate page for it is redundant. Deleted (and I will shortly set up the redirect, as I forgot to do that). -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 02:09, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

List of Moodlets (The Sims 4)[edit source]

Discussion moved to The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/List of Moodlets or Moodlet List

Benali family and Lobo family[edit source]

Discussion moved to The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/Benali family and Lobo family

Category:Creative Sims[edit source]

This category has only one member: Randy Hart, and that's about it. We don't have categories for Sims who merely have a high level in one skill, and we already have a category for Sims who mastered any kind of skill: Category:Sims who have mastered a skill. Right now the name is conflicting with Category:Creative Sims (trait); I suggest that "Category:Creative Sims" as it is now be cleared of its category members and the stuff over at "Category:Creative Sims (trait)" be moved over to this title. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 23:53, June 25, 2017 (UTC)

Absolutely. I strongly support what has just been suggested here. ― C.Syde (talk | contribs) 00:04, June 26, 2017 (UTC)
I also support this deletion. - SimDestroyer (talk) 14:29, March 12, 2018 (UTC)

Done -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 22:55, July 29, 2018 (UTC)

Template:TS4Traits and Template:TS4 traits[edit source]

I have found two templates that have a list of traits from The Sims 4, and these templates are not completed, and seems to abandoned. Then I found Template:Sims4Traits. This template seems to be completed and ready for action, so those two templates that I have listed for deletion should be deleted as Template:Sims4Traits is much better and completed. SimDestroyer (talk) 15:37, June 28, 2017 (UTC)

The two templates have been deleted. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 02:09, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

Recreational park and Mermaids[edit source]

This page is just a copy of Park article, but lower quality. SimDestroyer (talk) 12:11, August 22, 2017 (UTC)

Added Mermaids article to this, as that one is also a low quality copy of Mermaid. SimDestroyer (talk) 11:01, August 23, 2017 (UTC)

I redirected Mermaids to Mermaid as an alternative to deletion. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 11:09, August 23, 2017 (UTC)
I vote to delete the recreational park article. ✨AireDaleDogz✨ (talk) 10:41, February 15, 2018 (UTC)
AireDaleDogz, this is a discussion, not a vote; your comments must include some reasoning as to why you made your decision. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 11:37, February 15, 2018 (UTC)
I'd just be restating what SimDestroyer said, though. It's a low-quality copy of the Park article. Is everyone supposed to come up with different reasons? ✨AireDaleDogz✨ (talk) 11:56, February 15, 2018 (UTC)

Recreational park now redirects to park. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 02:09, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

Various Get to Work Sims[edit source]

Discussion moved to The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/Various Get to Work Sims

Career expansion comparisons[edit source]

Discussion moved to The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/Career expansion comparisons

Attic[edit source]

Discussion moved to The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/Attic

Bus[edit source]

I found this page to be very unnecessary. It also appears to be a poor quality copy of the Carpool page, just about one type of carpool. Isaiahhsnobg.pngIsaiahScribblenauts Plumbob.pngDisscuss - My Fanon 13:01, May 18, 2018 (UTC)   

I'm talking about transportation in The Sims Bustin Out. Cheseburgermac (talk) 13:05, May 18, 2018 (UTC)
However, still isn't necessary, as it has the same usage of travel in the Sims 2, 3 and Life Stories Isaiahhsnobg.pngIsaiahScribblenauts Plumbob.pngDisscuss - My Fanon 13:07, May 18, 2018 (UTC)
I oppose deletion. Cheseburgermac (talk) 13:10, May 18, 2018 (UTC)
Also, too late, since another user redirected it to Carpool. Isaiahhsnobg.pngIsaiahScribblenauts Plumbob.pngDisscuss - My Fanon 13:11, May 18, 2018 (UTC)
The information about the bus from the console games can be added to the carpool article. Ѧüя◎ґ (talk) 13:14, May 18, 2018 (UTC) 
I would like that. Cheseburgermac (talk) 13:15, May 18, 2018 (UTC)
Soooo... end of discussion. The page is a redirect now. Isaiahhsnobg.pngIsaiahScribblenauts Plumbob.pngDisscuss - My Fanon 14:46, May 18, 2018 (UTC)
Just one point of clarification (as I don't have any of the console games): is the bus functionally identical to the carpool, or does it use different gameplay mechanics? I would consider it functionally identical to the carpool if it shows up in front of a Sim's house to take them to/form work/school; if it is, say, like an actual public transit service where Sims can wait at a bus stop for scheduled buses to come and pick them up, then it could go into its own article. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 14:41, May 19, 2018 (UTC)
yes I guess it could be moved to the carpool page. Why it's just like a carpool. Thanks,Cheseburgermac (talk) 09:57, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

Discussion has concluded; page has been redirected to Carpool -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 01:20, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

School bus[edit source]

useless redirect page. Cheseburgermac (talk) 22:06, May 18, 2018 (UTC)

Eh, not really. There is no harm in keeping such a redirect alive, as some users/visitors could search for "school bus". With having this redirect, they would be directed to the carpool page. No need to delete it. - SimDestroyer (talk) 22:10, May 18, 2018 (UTC)
I strongly appose the deletion due to the same reasons stated by SimDestroyer. Isaiahhsnobg.pngIsaiahScribblenauts Plumbob.pngDisscuss - My Fanon 00:27, May 19, 2018 (UTC)

No seriously Cheseburgermac, please stop joking. What's your rationale for nominating this page for deletion? —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 03:16, May 19, 2018 (UTC)

I strongly oppose because this was a mistake on my behalf. Cheseburgermac (talk) 10:06, May 23, 2018 (UTC)

Nominating user is, in effect, withdrawing the nomination, and as no other user supports deletion, the end result is in favor of keep. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 01:20, July 27, 2018 (UTC)

Category:Sims named after real people[edit source]

Discussion moved to The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/Category:Sims named after real people

Template:Teen[edit source]

This "infobox" template has no real parameters and seems to have been created by mistake. Additionally I think we should just make it a speedy deletion criteria so we can delete these erroneous templates without having to go through this venue. —k6ka 🍁 (Talk · Contributions) 22:31, May 21, 2018 (UTC)

This does fall under speedy deletion criteria: (1) Reposted content that was already deleted according to policy. Ѧüя◎ґ (talk) 11:52, May 22, 2018 (UTC)
I support the deletion, for the same reasons that I said regarding the Sim maker template. - SimDestroyer (talk) 17:10, May 22, 2018 (UTC)
Ok, I support deletion. I do have to the same reasons that I had for the Sim maker template. Plus, this one might have been made by mistake since no parameter but the defaults were made. Isaiahhsnobg.pngIsaiahScribblenauts Plumbob.pngDisscuss - My Fanon 12:10, May 23, 2018 (UTC)
if it's in Speedy deletion criteria why don't we put the template  on there? Cheseburgermac (talk) 10:03, May 23, 2018 (UTC)
I also support deletion as the infobox doesn't have a good appearance in comparison to the {{Sim}} infobox and it doesn't appear to be of any use to the wiki as it seems to have been made by accident and I don't particularly want another Sim maker type infobox on the wiki. Daryurian (The Mighty Turian) 08:27, May 24, 2018 (UTC)

It seems that there is support for deleting the template. So, deleted it shall be. -- LostInRiverview talk · blog · contribs 01:20, July 27, 2018 (UTC)[edit source]

Discussion moved to The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/

Template:Aries[edit source]

Discussion moved to The Sims Wiki:Pages for deletion/Template:Aries